We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Harmonized protocols for surveying and monitoring litter, plastics and microplastics - UPSTREAM project approach
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper describes the UPSTREAM project, which monitors plastic pollution, from large litter to microplastics, at five sites including wastewater treatment plants and the Danube River. Researchers worked to standardize methods for collecting, preparing and analyzing samples across different institutions, so results can be compared between locations.
Plastic pollution is a diverse contaminant that represents a continuum of properties, from macro scale litter, down to micro and nanoplastic particles, as well as the leachable compounds associated with such plastics. As such no single analytical technique can monitor “plastics” in the environment, and the region of this continuum targeted for monitoring in the Horizon Europe project UPSTREAM is dependent on the technology under development at each of the demonstration sites in the project and the analytical techniques available across the partners. A total of five demonstration sites connecting seven rivers, feeding into five sea basins are to be investigated in the UPSTREAM project. Of these demonstration sites, four technologies associated with wastewater treatment works are investigated whilst the fifth site is the Danube River itself in Serbia. At each demonstration site, either litter, microplastics, leachable compounds associated with plastics, or a combination of these are the target of monitoring. Given the diversity of analytes, locations and institutions required to achieve the monitoring goals in the project, it was essential that standards are used where available, and harmonisation of methods is encouraged where such standards do not exist. There are four critical areas for harmonisation when considering monitoring in the environment: sample collection, sample preparation, sample analysis, as well as data analysis and interpretation. Taking each of the major analytes for monitoring, these aspects of harmonisation are considered, standard operating procedures collected, and agreement reached for recommendations for harmonisation across methodologies. The ambition is to allow evaluation of demo sites themselves but also between sites.
More Papers Like This
Assessment of Different Sampling, Sample Preparation and Analysis Methods Addressing Microplastic Concentration and Transport in Medium and Large Rivers Based on Research in the Danube River Basin
AI summary Read the abstract
Monitoring microplastics in rivers is hampered by the lack of standardized methods, making it difficult to compare results across studies. This research tested three common sampling approaches on the Danube River and its tributaries, finding that each method produced meaningfully different estimates of microplastic concentrations and transport. The results underscore the urgent need for agreed-upon protocols so that data from different countries and research groups can be reliably combined to track river-to-ocean plastic pollution.
Microplastics in riverine systems: Recommendations for standardized sampling, separation, digestion and characterization
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper provides standardized recommendations for microplastic sampling, separation, digestion, and characterization protocols in riverine systems, addressing methodological inconsistency that limits cross-study comparability. The authors propose harmonized operating procedures for field sampling and laboratory analysis to improve the reliability and comparability of microplastic data across river studies globally.
Estimating plastic pollution in rivers through harmonized monitoring strategies
AI summary Read the abstract
This study characterized microplastic contamination in surface water and fish from rivers flowing through areas with varying land use, finding that agricultural and urban catchments consistently had higher microplastic concentrations than forested reference catchments. The results provide evidence that land use is a primary predictor of riverine microplastic contamination.
Same but Different: A Framework to Design and Compare Riverbank Plastic Monitoring Strategies
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper proposed a framework for designing and comparing riverbank plastic monitoring programs, addressing how differences in methodology make existing datasets difficult to compare. By standardizing site selection, sampling effort, and data reporting, the framework aims to improve understanding of macroplastic sources, sinks, and transport in rivers.
New sampling strategies for optimised microplastic analysis in surface waters
AI summary Read the abstract
This German study proposed and tested improved sampling strategies for microplastic analysis in surface waters, addressing the lack of standardization that makes it difficult to compare results across studies. Harmonized sampling and analysis protocols are identified as essential for building reliable environmental monitoring databases.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.