We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Outdoor mesocosm experiment provides novel insights into the relative importance of water and food as sources of microplastics to aquatic amphibians
AI summary Read the abstract
Bullfrog tadpoles in outdoor tanks were exposed to microplastics through water, food, or both. Tadpoles absorbed plastic particles from both sources, with most particles found in the gut, and particles inside tadpoles were smaller than those found in the surrounding water or food.
Most studies examining microplastic uptake by aquatic amphibians have only examined uptake from water, disregarding other potentially important exposure pathways. Here, we compare the relative importance of water and food as sources of microplastics to the American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus), as well as investigate how exposure pathway affects the concentration and size of microplastics in tadpoles. Following a 2 × 2 factorial design, 60 wild-caught tadpoles (Gosner stage 25;15 tadpoles per treatment) were exposed in outdoor mesocosms to one of four treatments, in which microplastics were present or absent in water and food. To assess water exposure, white polyethylene (PE) fragments were added to the water column (888 ± 514 particles/L), whereas to assess food exposure, grey PE fragments were added to food (12.3 ± 3.46 particles/g agar). Over the 10-d experiment, tadpoles were collected every 48 h to analyze the microplastics in their gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and carcass (body with the GIT removed). Here, we report evidence that tadpoles acquired microplastics from both water and food, with tadpoles that were simultaneously exposed through both pathways containing an average of 666 ± 699 particles/g waterborne microplastics and 120 ± 118 particles/g foodborne microplastics in their GIT. The waterborne pathway contributed significantly to total microplastic concentrations in both the GIT and carcass, whereas the foodborne pathway only contributed significantly to total microplastics concentrations in the GIT. On average, 71 ± 23% of microplastics in tadpoles were in their GIT, suggesting that ingestion was the dominant-but not exclusive-route of exposure. Microplastic size did not differ between exposure routes, however, microplastics were on average smaller in tadpoles (0.088 ± 0.099 mm) than in water (0.231 ± 0.094 mm) or food (0.139 ± 0.078 mm). Our study emphasizes the importance of considering multiple exposure pathways when assessing risks of plastic pollution to aquatic biota.
More Papers Like This
Uptake, accumulation and elimination of polystyrene microspheres in tadpoles of Xenopus tropicalis
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers exposed frog tadpoles to polystyrene microspheres and tracked uptake and elimination, finding that tadpoles readily ingested particles that accumulated in the gut and were gradually eliminated, with implications for amphibian exposure in plastic-contaminated ponds.
Similarity of Microplastic Characteristics between Amphibian Larvae and Their Aquatic Environment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared microplastic characteristics in amphibian larvae with those in their surrounding aquatic environment, finding similarities in size distribution and polymer types that confirm direct ingestion from water, providing a new bioindicator approach for freshwater microplastic monitoring.
Life on both environment in semi-aquatic frogs: Impact of aquatic microplastic (MP) from MP enrichment to growth, immune function and physiological stress
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers exposed juvenile black-spotted pond frogs to different concentrations of microplastics in water to study effects after metamorphosis. They found that microplastics accumulated primarily in the digestive tract and caused reduced growth, increased stress markers, and weakened immune function at higher concentrations. The study suggests that microplastic pollution in freshwater habitats could pose significant health risks to amphibians during vulnerable life stages.
Distribution of microplastics in tadpoles, adults, and habitats of three water frogs of Pelophylax spp.
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers examined microplastics in water frogs and their habitats across Turkey, finding that while tadpoles showed almost no microplastic ingestion, 44% of adult frogs had microplastics in their digestive tracts — mostly fibers from synthetic textiles. The findings highlight how microplastic contamination increases with life stage and proximity to human activity, threatening amphibian populations already under environmental stress.
Microplastic ingestion by tadpoles of pond-breeding amphibians—first results from Central Europe (SW Poland)
AI summary Read the abstract
This study found microplastics in the guts of tadpoles from five amphibian species collected from eight ponds in southwestern Poland, identifying polyethylene and polypropylene as the most common polymer types. The detection of microplastics in freshwater amphibian larvae in Central European ponds confirms that plastic pollution has reached small, inland water bodies and is affecting early developmental stages of amphibians.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.