We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Probabilistic T-spherical hesitant fuzzy decision support for selecting advanced tertiary wastewater treatment technologies using comprehensive distance based ranking method
AI summary Read the abstract
This study built a decision-making tool to help compare advanced wastewater treatment technologies for removing pollutants like microplastics, pharmaceuticals and PFAS that regular treatment misses. Using expert input and ranking methods, it found that combined membrane-oxidation systems performed best among seven treatment options tested, based on pollutant removal effectiveness and cost.
Pharmaceuticals, microplastics, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and endocrine-disrupting compounds are increasingly discharged in treated wastewater, are not effectively removed by conventional secondary treatment, and have important implications for the environment and human health. Advanced tertiary treatment is needed for safe reuse of urban non-potable water, but the choice among competing technologies is a complex decision involving technical, economic, environmental and regulatory considerations, as well as uncertainty and reluctance in expert evaluations. To address this issue, this research uses a decision support system based on Probabilistic T-Spherical Hesitant Fuzzy Numbers (Pt-SHFNs) that represents probabilistic uncertainty, ambiguity and expert hesitance consistently. A hybrid method is used to find criteria weights. The hybrid method combines the Level-Based Weight Assessment (LBWA) technique and changes of empirical data. This allows the subjective preferences of experts and objective evidence to be simultaneously considered. Then the alternatives are ranked using Comprehensive Distance Based Ranking (COBRA) technique. The results show that in the practical case of seven tertiary treatment systems, the effectiveness of removal of emerging pollutants (0.2319) and capital expenditures (0.1713) are the most influential factors. The most efficient systems are hybrid membrane-advanced oxidation process systems (0.0338) followed by ozonation-biofiltration (0.0203) and nanofiltration membranes (-0.0022). The stability analysis and comparison studies with other MCDM techniques increase the dependability and consistency of the obtained rankings. The proposed technique provides an explicit and uncertainty-aware basis for ranking tertiary alternatives to treatment and could assist wastewater utilities and regulators in integrating technical decisions with sustainability and water reuse objectives.
More Papers Like This
Selection of a sustainable treatment process for removal of microplastics from wastewater by axiomatic design and PROMETHEE
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared multiple water treatment processes for microplastic removal and identified selection criteria for sustainable treatment approaches, finding that coagulation-flocculation, membrane filtration, and biological treatment each offered different trade-offs in cost, efficiency, and byproduct generation.
Recent approaches and advanced wastewater treatment technologies for mitigating emerging microplastics contamination – A critical review
AI summary Read the abstract
This review critically assessed advanced wastewater treatment technologies for removing microplastics, noting that conventional treatment plants act as both barriers and point sources for microplastic release into the environment. The study suggests that advanced treatment approaches such as membrane filtration and advanced oxidation processes show promise for improving microplastic removal efficiency from wastewater.
Integrating microplastic management into a broader wastewater decision-making framework. Is activated granular sludge (AGS) a game changer?
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared three wastewater treatment technologies for their ability to remove microplastics: conventional activated sludge, membrane bioreactors, and activated granular sludge. While membrane bioreactors performed best at removing microplastics, activated granular sludge emerged as the most cost-effective option with strong overall environmental performance. The study suggests that integrating microplastic management into wastewater treatment decisions requires balancing removal efficiency against energy use, cost, and environmental impact.
Hybrid Wastewater Treatment: Efficiency and Challenges in Microplastic Removal
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed laboratory, pilot, and full-scale evidence for hybrid wastewater treatment configurations — combining membrane bioreactors, coagulation-flocculation, electrocoagulation, ozonation, and advanced filtration — finding near-complete microplastic removal is achievable, though fibers and particles below 100 µm remain the most persistent fraction across all treatment combinations.
Design of an Efficient Model for Microplastic Removal in Wastewater using Advanced Filtration, Nanotechnology, and Bioremediation
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper proposed an advanced machine learning model to design and optimize microplastic removal in wastewater treatment, using process parameters to predict removal efficiency. The intelligent model outperformed conventional design approaches in predicting treatment outcomes.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.