We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
High-throughput detection and polymer profiling of microplastics in carbonated soft drinks using laser direct infrared (LDIR) spectroscopy across polyethylene terephthalate and aluminium packaging.
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists tested popular canned and bottled soda brands and found tiny plastic particles (microplastics) in every single sample, with plastic bottles generally containing more than aluminum cans. While researchers used a fast new scanning method to detect these mostly ultra-tiny particles (smaller than a grain of sand), the study didn't assess health effects, so the big question of whether these microplastic levels actually harm us remains unanswered.
Microplastic (MP) contamination in beverages has emerged as a growing environmental and public health concern. In this study, Laser Direct Infrared (LDIR) spectroscopy was employed for the rapid detection, quantification, and polymer characterization of MPs in commercially available carbonated soft drinks packaged in polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles and aluminium cans in Malaysia. Triplicate samples from four major beverage brands were analyzed. MPs were detected in all samples, with concentrations ranging from 152 ± 110 to 330 ± 404 MPs/L in canned beverages and from 79 ± 17 to 727 ± 244 MPs/L in PET-packaged beverages. Overall, PET bottles exhibited higher MP concentrations than aluminium cans. Polymer analysis identified PET, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyamide (PA), polyurethane (PU), and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in these samples. Most detected particles were smaller than 50 μm. These findings demonstrate the suitability of LDIR spectroscopy as a rapid, automated, and high-throughput approach for comprehensive MP analysis in carbonated beverages.
More Papers Like This
Assessing microplastic contamination in soda beverages: A Multi-city, Multi-container laser Direct infrared spectroscopy study
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested soda beverages from four major U.S. cities in three container types, aluminum, glass, and plastic, using infrared spectroscopy to identify microplastics. They found that microplastic contamination patterns differed somewhat by city but showed no significant difference between container materials, suggesting that geographic factors may play a larger role than packaging in determining what ends up in beverages.
Assessing microplastic characteristics in bottled drinking water and air deposition samples using laser direct infrared imaging
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used a rapid laser-based detection method to measure microplastics in bottled water and indoor air, finding an average of 96 plastic particles per liter in bottled water and detecting that indoor textiles are a major source of microplastic particles that settle onto food during meals.
Prevalence and characteristics of microplastic contamination in soft drinks and potential consumer exposure
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested nine popular soft drink brands in Thailand and found microplastics in every single one, regardless of whether the packaging was plastic, aluminum, or glass. Concentrations ranged from 2 to 39 particles per liter, with most particles being tiny fragments between 50 and 100 micrometers. Based on average soft drink consumption, a person in Thailand could swallow between 81 and 1,609 microplastic particles per year just from soft drinks alone.
Detection, characterization, and human exposure risk assessment of microplastics in soft drinks from Indian markets with an integrated consumer behavior survey approach
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested 12 popular Indian soft drink brands and found tiny plastic particles (called microplastics) in every single sample, with colored sodas containing the highest amounts. Most of these particles were tiny plastic fibers, likely shedding from packaging and production equipment, and while scientists are still studying the long-term health effects of ingesting microplastics, this study adds to growing evidence that they're showing up in many everyday foods and drinks we consume. The findings suggest a need for better manufacturing practices and safety standards to reduce this exposure.
What's in your water? A comparative analysis of micro- and nanoplastics in treated drinking water and bottled water
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed a novel method to detect both micro- and nanoplastics in drinking water using scanning electron microscopy and advanced infrared spectroscopy capable of identifying particles as small as 300 nanometers. The study found that bottled water had significantly higher concentrations of plastic particles than treated tap water, particularly for smaller micro- and nanoplastics, with polyamide, PET, and polyethylene being the most common polymers.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.