0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Role of Amorphous Chains in Nanoplastic Formation from Semicrystalline Polymers

ACS Macro Letters 2026
Michele Valsecchi, Sameer Kalghatgi, Nicholas F. Mendez, Clarissa Lincoln, Nicholas A. Rorrer, Sanat K. Kumar

Summary

Scientists discovered that plastic items like PET bottles don't need much chemical breakdown before they start shedding tiny plastic fragments, just a tiny fraction of the material's internal bonds need to break before the whole structure becomes brittle and crumbles into micro- and nanoplastics. This matters because it suggests everyday plastics may release these particles (which we're increasingly finding in our bodies) more easily than previously assumed, even under mild conditions like normal aging or storage.

Polymers
Body Systems

Abstract Semicrystalline polymers, e.g., polyethylene terephthalate (PET), release micro- (100 nm to 1 mm) and nanoplastics (up to 100 nm) [MNPL] when they are degraded under quiescent conditions. However, the exact molecular mechanisms leading to material fragmentation into MNPL are unknown. Here, we monitor the evolution of chain molecular weight and the MNPL production kinetics during hydrolysis of PET pellets. We find that only ≈0.6% of the amorphous phase ester bonds are hydrolyzed at the onset of MNPL release. Then, by combining a random scission model with measured amorphous spacings, we estimate that only ≈15% of the stress transmitters in the amorphous phase, namely, bridges and entangled loops, have failed by this point. Thus, spontaneous fragmentation of the semicrystalline nanostructure occurs despite significant intercrystalline connectivity. We resolve this apparent contradiction by proposing that fragmentation can only occur when progressive tie-chain scission causes the material to undergo the ductile/brittle transition. Mechanistically, we speculate that the internal stresses responsible for material fragmentation are caused by processing (i.e., residual stresses) and/or sample densification induced by chemi-crystallization. We discuss additional factors that may affect our analysis and thus require further investigation, such as skin-core effects, preferential degradation of stress transmitters and/or recrystallization processes.

Share this paper