We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
The Global Plastics Treaty and Brazil from Putnam’s Two-Level Game Theory: Converging on Divergences?
AI summary Read the abstract
Brazil, one of the world's top sources of ocean plastic pollution, is playing a careful political game in global treaty talks: pushing hard for other countries to help fund and build up plastic waste management systems, while staying vague on whether it would actually support producing less plastic or restricting harmful chemicals in plastic products. This matters because weak or watered-down treaty terms could mean continued high levels of plastic waste and the microplastics and chemical additives that come with it, substances increasingly linked to health concerns like hormone disruption and inflammation, keep entering our water, food, and bodies with fewer real limits in place.
Impact StatementBrazil is among the largest contributors to plastic pollution leaks into the oceans but there are several challenges for the country to compromise on international regulation on the issue.During negotiations for a Global Plastic Treaty, Brazil's strategy reflected a central concern with the architecture of the treaty's implementation, seeking to proactively address the lack of capacity as the main barrier to compliance.The insistence on these terms highlights the attempt to build a robust bridge between global obligations and domestic capabilities, ensuring that the ambition of the agreement is not lost in its execution.Our analysis reveals a two-pronged strategy: one of encouraging popular mobilization through a strong social appeal, and another of structural negotiation focused on implementation capacity, leaving open the fundamental question whether the country would support measures towards reducing plastic production or chemicals controls on plastic.
More Papers Like This
A little less conversation: How existing governance can strengthen the future global plastics treaty
AI summary Read the abstract
This analysis examines existing multi-level governance structures for plastics—from global agreements to local regulations—and explores how a new global plastics treaty could complement rather than duplicate these existing frameworks. The authors identify principal roles, shortcomings, and gaps in current governance and propose ways to integrate a new binding instrument with the Basel, Rotterdam, and Stockholm Conventions and other relevant regulatory bodies.
Towards a global plastics treaty: Navigating policy preferences and economic interests
AI summary Read the abstract
This study analyzed pre-session submissions from the second and third rounds of UN global plastics treaty negotiations using systematic qualitative content analysis, identifying a clear divergence between ambitious clusters advocating for upstream production controls and less ambitious clusters focusing on downstream waste management. The analysis predicted that countries with vested interests in plastic production would defend economic positions by limiting the treaty to downstream solutions, potentially undermining the goal of ending plastic pollution.
Towards a global plastics treaty: Navigating policy preferences and economic interests
AI summary Read the abstract
Countries are negotiating a global treaty to fight plastic pollution, but this study finds a split: some nations want to limit plastic production itself, while others, often those with plastic manufacturing industries, prefer focusing only on waste cleanup. If cleanup-only approaches win out, plastic production keeps growing, meaning more plastic and microplastics entering our food, water, and bodies over time.
From total volume control to governance logic: a legal review and institutional solution for the production cap rules in global plastics agreements
AI summary Read the abstract
Countries negotiating a global plastics treaty are stuck arguing over whether to cap how much new plastic gets made, since plastic production is a major source of the microplastics and chemicals linked to health problems. This legal analysis suggests a strict global cap won't work politically, and instead proposes sorting plastics by risk level and assigning different rules to different countries, a compromise that could actually get adopted and start reducing plastic pollution sooner.
Desafios e perspectivas no enfrentamento da poluição marinha por plástico sob a ótica das negociações do acordo global juridicamente vinculante
AI summary Read the abstract
This research examined the prospects for tackling marine plastic pollution through negotiations on a globally legally binding plastic agreement under UNEP auspices. The study concluded that while the treaty represents a significant advance over existing fragmented frameworks, significant challenges remain due to contradictory options in the draft text and difficulties reaching global consensus on binding provisions.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.