0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Everyday certainty and scientific uncertainty: potentials of scientists’ perspectives from microplastics research to address uncertainty in science education

AI summary Read the abstract

This isn't a health study, but rather research about how scientists themselves grapple with uncertainty when studying microplastics in our blood, a field so new that even the experts aren't sure how to measure or interpret it yet. Researchers interviewed scientists studying microplastics and found some approach the unknowns purely analytically, while others also experience real emotional responses, like fear, when confronting the limits of what current detection methods can tell us. The takeaway for the public: when you hear about microplastics in blood, know that scientists themselves are still working through significant uncertainty, this is normal, ongoing science rather than settled fact, and that nuance

Models

Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in human blood represent an emerging research field characterised by uncertainty and public interest. While scientific knowledge is often portrayed as certain in public and educational contexts, scientific literacy approaches emphasise that today’s socio-scientifically relevant problems are complex with changing evidence. In this article an educational perspective on uncertainty for science education is proposed, using the extended Model of Educational Reconstruction (MER) as research framework. Drawing on interviews with MNPs researchers (n = 5), we analyse how they understand and experience uncertainty, differentiating between objectifying (e.g. construction of scientific concepts) and subjectifying (e.g. emotional engagement) approaches. The article focuses on two contrasting cases: one is mainly characterised by objectifying conceptions of understanding and dealing with uncertainty, whereas the other shows a strong intertwining of objectifying and subjectifying conceptions linking limits of detection to experiences of fear. Based on our findings, we discuss refinements of existing classifications of uncertainty integrating interdisciplinary science-in-the-making contexts. We further argue that the heterogeneity of scientists’ understandings and experiences can support reflective engagement with uncertainty in science education by fostering students’ individual meaning-making processes. The findings therefore indicate that the extended MER enables a systematic integration of objectifying and subjectifying perspectives for science education.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Addressing the topic, Microplastics in Human Blood, in school – Connecting school students' and scientists' perspectives

AI summary Read the abstract

This study developed educational approaches to help school students critically engage with the topic of microplastics in human blood, which is often framed as alarming in public discourse despite significant scientific uncertainty about health relevance. The curriculum connected blood microplastic findings to broader science literacy skills including evidence appraisal and risk communication.

Article Tier 2

Communicating scientific uncertainties: Effects of message and audience characteristics in the context of microplastic health risks

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted an experiment with over 1,100 participants in Austria to study how communicating scientific uncertainty about microplastic health risks affects public perception. They found that emphasizing a lack of scientific consensus led to lower risk perception and indirectly reduced support for related policies. Framing uncertainty as remaining knowledge gaps rather than disagreement among scientists produced less negative effects on public engagement.

Article Tier 2

Addressing the topic, Microplastics in Human Blood, in school – Connecting school students' and scientists' perspectives

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers examined the disconnect between public concern and scientific evidence about microplastics in human blood, developing educational approaches to help school students engage critically with the topic. The study identified strategies for connecting classroom learning about blood microplastics to broader science literacy and evidence-based thinking skills.

Article Tier 2

Uncertainty about the risks associated with microplastics among lay and topic-experienced respondents

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers surveyed 1,681 respondents globally and found significant uncertainty about microplastic health risks not only among the general public but also among scientists who study plastics, reflecting the genuine knowledge gaps in current research on microplastic hazards.

Article Tier 2

Communicating the absence of evidence for microplastics risk: Balancing sensation and reflection

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers examined how scientists and health agencies should communicate when evidence for microplastic risk is limited or absent, arguing that "no evidence of harm" does not mean "evidence of no harm." The paper calls for more careful and nuanced science communication to avoid misleading policymakers about the actual state of uncertainty around microplastic health risks.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper