We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Probabilistic environmental risk assessment of non-dissolvable nanomaterials (TiO2, CNTs, graphene-based materials, polystyrene nanoplastics) in the terrestrial ecosystem
Summary
Scientists analyzed how tiny engineered materials—like those found in sunscreens (titanium dioxide), electronics (carbon nanotubes and graphene), and plastic pollution (nanoplastics)—build up in soil, especially soil treated with sewage sludge (a common fertilizer). The good news: most of these materials aren't currently at levels that harm soil life like plants and worms, but titanium dioxide nanoparticles already pose a risk in sludge-treated soils, and as pollution levels rise over time, the risk from these materials could grow. This matters because healthy soil is the foundation of our food supply,
The accumulation of engineered nanomaterials and nanoplastics in soils, especially sludge-treated soils, raises concerns regarding their potential environmental hazard and risks. This work applies probabilistic environmental risk assessment based on probabilistic species sensitivity distributions (pSSD) and published data from exposure models to derive risk characterization ratios (RCR) for four non-dissolvable nanomaterials: TiO2, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene-based materials (GBMs), and polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-nanoplastics). Median predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) values were found to be 36, 1.5, 56, and 0.5 mg.kg-1, for TiO2, CNTs, GBMs and PS-nanoplastics, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the effects of nanomaterials on plants versus invertebrates, or on monocotyledonous versus dicotyledonous plants. Form-specific comparisons also showed no statistical difference among the different nanomaterial forms (TiO2: P25 vs. anatase vs. rutile; CNTs: multi-walled CNTs vs. single-walled CNTs; GBMs: graphene vs. graphene oxide vs. reduce graphene oxide). At currently predicted environmental concentrations in European soils, none of the materials exhibits an environmental risk, except for TiO2-NPs in sludge-treated soils, where 66% of the simulations resulted in a RCR higher than 1 (median RCR = 1.38). However, a projected increase in environmental concentrations over time can result in larger potential risks in the future. This work also highlights the limitations of the current state of the art in terms of the availability of environmentally relevant ecotoxicity data in soils and of realistic predicted environmental concentrations.