0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Ecofriendly or Ecofiction: Reviewing Environmental Hazards of Plastic-Modified Asphalt Pavements

Journal of Hazardous Toxic and Radioactive Waste 2026 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Kanika, Bhupendra Singh, Pranav Saraswat, Anand Sreeram, Hebah Jahan

Summary

Mixing recycled plastic into road asphalt is often marketed as a green solution, but this review of existing research finds it's more complicated: the process can release microplastics, harmful fumes, and leached chemicals, with the amount depending on the type of plastic and how it's mixed into the asphalt. Road workers who repeatedly breathe in these fumes or handle the hot material may face increased health risks, including possible links to cancer, so the paper calls for smarter mixing methods and more research before treating plastic roads as a clear environmental win.

Global plastic production currently exceeds 350 million tonnes annually and is projected to surpass 1,100 million tonnes by 2050. This presents a major obstacle to waste management and sustainable construction practices. To address this issue, the incorporation of plastics into asphalt pavements has gained attention as a strategy to both divert waste from landfills and enhance pavement performance. However, plastic-modified asphalt pavement also raises environmental and occupational health concerns, including fume emissions, microplastic (MP) release, chemical leaching, and exposure risks for workers. Most studies focus on these impacts individually, and few investigations systematically assess them across different plastic types, mixing methods, and operational conditions. This review addresses this gap by providing a comprehensive and broad-spectrum assessment of five major plastics (low-density polyethylene, high-density polyethylene, polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and polyvinyl chloride) used in asphalt modification. Laboratory and field studies are integrated to assess fume emissions, MP generation, leaching of contaminants, and occupational health risks. Findings indicate that plastic modification can enhance pavement stability, while emissions and leaching depend strongly on plastic type, mixing method, and processing temperature. The release of MP is influenced by both the plastic type and the incorporation approach, with wet mixing generally producing fewer fragments than dry mixing. Worker exposure to high temperatures and repeated contact presents potential genotoxic and carcinogenic risks. Overall, optimizing mixing practices, assessing long-term environmental impacts, and adopting a holistic sustainability perspective are essential for an ecofriendly and effective implementation.

Share this paper