We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Developing Aero-Floating Treatment Wetland (AEROFTW) Scaffolds: A Non-Plastic Alternative to Conventional Plastic-Based FTWS
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists tested a plastic-free way to build floating plant platforms that clean up polluted water in ponds—swapping out standard plastic parts for recycled glass, steel mesh, and natural fibers like burlap and bamboo. The glass-and-steel version held up well and let plants grow, though not as robustly as hoped, while the burlap version fell apart too quickly. This matters because conventional floating wetlands shed microplastics into water over time, so finding sturdy plastic-free alternatives could mean cleaner water with less added plastic pollution—which is good news since microplastics have been linked to potential health concerns in people
This research was conducted to explore the possibility of constructing floating treatment wetlands (FTWs) without using plastic materials. FTWs are floating platforms that hold plants on the water’s surface, letting roots dangle within the water column, to help remove contaminants from contaminated water, especially in stormwater ponds. Many conventional FTWs are made with plastic components, such as mats and plastic cup containers, which can release microplastics into the environment over time. The goal of this project was to design and test a new type of FTW that does not depend on plastics to support FTW flotation. The study took place at the South Carolina Water Resources Center in Pendleton, South Carolina, where all experiments were carried out at a small scale inside a greenhouse. The main material tested was an aero-glass aggregate, made of 99% recycled glass. These glass aggregates were evaluated for their ability to provide buoyancy to the floating structures. Because this new design primarily relied on these glass materials, we named it aeroFTWs. Additional natural and non-plastic materials including jute burlap fabric, jute twine, bamboo, and steel hardware cloth were used to complete the design and support the structure. We also assessed whether wetland plants could grow normally in this new design by measuring their root length and shoot height throughout the experiment. The project consisted of two experiments. In Experiment I, we used burlap fabric, jute twine, bamboo, and glass aggregates to construct the aeroFTWs. We evaluated the growth of saltmeadow cordgrass (Spartina patens). However, the burlap and twine iii materials degraded quickly, causing the structure to lose integrity and break apart. As a result, we were unable to continue collecting root length data for this experiment. In Experiment II, we developed a stronger design that included glass aggregates and steel hardware cloth. This version maintained its structure throughout the experiment and remained stable. Pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata) and cattail (Typha latifolia) were planted in this design. Both species grew, but their shoot and root development was less vigorous than expected. This may have been due to the absence of organic materials that could provide nutrients to the plants or lack of enough nuitrients in the water for the roots to absorb so the plants could develop further. We also used a CT scanner to observe how the roots interacted with the glass aggregates. The scans revealed that the roots grew both around and inside the small pores of the glass aggregates (pieces). This finding suggests that plant roots can help hold the aggregates together and may play an important role in maintaining structural stability if other materials begin to degrade. Overall, this study demonstrated that recycled glass aggregates are a promising alternative to plastics for constructing FTWs. However, further research is needed to continue improving aeroFTW design, identify other durable, non-plastic materials that can complement this design and better support healthy plant growth.
More Papers Like This
Polymer-specific plant and microbial responses in constructed wetland microcosms under combined microplastic and heavy metal exposure
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested whether tiny plastic particles (microplastics) mess up nature-based water treatment systems that filter out heavy metals like lead and zinc — and the good news is these wetland systems kept working well, removing over 90% of heavy metals even with plastic pollution present. However, the type of plastic mattered: polyester fibers caused more stress to plants and reduced the diversity of helpful bacteria compared to other plastic types, suggesting that as microplastic pollution grows, the shape and material of plastic debris could matter for how well these natural water-cleaning systems continue to protect our water supplies.
Floating Treatment Wetlands Made of HDPE and PET Can Be Sources of Microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
This laboratory study tested whether floating treatment wetland (FTW) support systems made of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and PET plastics release microplastics into treated water. Both HDPE and PET FTW materials shed measurable quantities of microplastics under simulated conditions, indicating that plastic-based stormwater treatment infrastructure can itself become a source of microplastic contamination.
Small-Scale Model Experiments on Plastic Fragment Removal from Water Flows Using Multiple Filters in a Floating Body
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers designed small-scale floating filter devices to remove plastic fragments from water flow, testing multiple filter configurations in laboratory experiments. Physical filtration of plastic particles from water offers a practical approach to preventing microplastic accumulation in aquatic environments.
Retention of microplastics by interspersed lagoons in both natural and constructed wetlands
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used laboratory wetland models to test how well constructed wetlands with interspersed lagoons and aquatic vegetation can capture microplastic particles from water. Combining vegetated patches with a lagoon achieved microplastic retention rates of up to 99%, suggesting that nature-based wetland designs could be an effective low-cost strategy for filtering microplastics out of wastewater and rivers before they reach the ocean.
Understanding microplastic retention in surface flow constructed wetlands: The impact of aquatic macrophytes
AI summary Read the abstract
This study tested how well constructed wetlands with different aquatic plants retain three common types of microplastics: polyethylene beads, tire wear particles, and synthetic fibers. Plants with complex leaf structures trapped more microplastics than simpler plants or unvegetated areas. The findings suggest that planted wetlands could serve as a nature-based solution for filtering microplastics from water before they reach rivers and drinking water sources.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.