0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Influence of additives on long-term degradation and microplastic formation of polyethylene

ChemRxiv 2026
Hülya Markl-Hahn, Anika Mauel, Max Friedel, Niklas Bauriedel, Ulrich Mansfeld, Winfried Kretschmer, Julia Utz, Jürgen Senker, Holger Ruckdaeschel, Holger Ruckdäschel

Summary

Plastic packaging (like the LDPE used in food wrap and containers) breaks down into microplastics faster or slower depending on the protective chemical additives mixed into it — and even UV-stabilized plastics that resist major cracking still shed tiny microplastic particles over time. This matters because it shows that the "shelf life" and safety of plastic products against microplastic shedding isn't just about the type of plastic, but also about the specific additive formula used, meaning some plastics may be quietly releasing microplastics into food or the environment well before visible damage appears.

Polymers

There are limited studies showing how additive contents used for packaging plastics affect polymer degradation and microplastic formation. Hence, we used accelerated abiotic weathering for studying the mechanisms leading to the degradation of additivated, semi-crystalline low-density polyethylene (LDPE). For this purpose, LDPE plates with different, realistic concentrations of additives (antioxidants and UV stabilizers) were weathered in an accelerated weathering chamber and analyzed using SEM, DSC, high temperature GPC and solid-state 13C CP MAS NMR spectroscopy. Our results reveal that non-UV-stabilized LDPE degrades rapidly, showing extensive microcracking, molecular weight reduction, and formation of polar polymer defects within 600 hours. The addition of hindered amine light stabilizers (HALS) significantly delays these effects, yet their performance varies depending on the specific formulation. While Tinuvin 622 protects the polymer for about 2500 hours before sudden degradation and cracking occurs, Tinuvin 783 effectively prevents severe chain scission and large crack formation over the sampled 4000 hours of exposure. However, even with Tinuvin 783, fine surface microcracks still develop and cause the detachment of small microplastic particles. Ultimately, the most important finding is that even small amounts of additives have strong effects dictating not only the degradation kinetics but also the shape and chemical composition of the secondary microplastic particles formed by fragmentation.

Share this paper