0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Unraveling the impact of nano-microscale polyethylene and polypropylene plastics on Nicotiana tabacum: Physiological responses and molecular mechanisms

Environmental and Experimental Botany 2025 5 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 63 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Muhammad Shoaib, Muhammad Shoaib, Weichang Gao, Muhammad Arshad, Muhammad Shoaib, Muhammad Arshad, Muhammad Shoaib, Zhaolu Zhou, Huijuan Zhang, Zhaolu Zhou, Huijuan Zhang, Weichang Gao, Huijuan Zhang, Weichang Gao, Weichang Gao, Weichang Gao, Yichi Zhang, Weichang Gao, Muhammad Shoaib, Shaojie Lin, Shaojie Lin, Muhammad Arshad, Huijuan Zhang, Muhammad Shoaib, Muhammad Shoaib, Muhammad Arshad, Weichang Gao, Muhammad Shoaib, Huijuan Zhang, Muhammad Arshad, Weichang Gao, Huixin Li Jun Wu, Huixin Li Fengping Hu, Huixin Li, Huixin Li Fengping Hu, Fengping Hu, Huixin Li Huijuan Zhang, Huixin Li Huixin Li, Huixin Li Fengping Hu, Jun Wu, Huijuan Zhang, Fengping Hu, Huixin Li Huijuan Zhang, Jun Wu, Huixin Li, Huixin Li

Summary

Researchers exposed tobacco plants to polyethylene and polypropylene microplastics of different sizes and found that both types suppressed plant growth in a dose-dependent manner, with polypropylene being more toxic. The microplastics disrupted photosynthesis, triggered oxidative stress, and altered hormone signaling and defense pathways in the plants. These findings demonstrate that microplastic contamination in soil can impair crop growth at the molecular level, potentially affecting agricultural productivity.

Polymers

Plastics, as emerging pollutants, are increasingly found in soil, yet their systemic impact on soil ecosystems and plants remains poorly understood. This study explores the impacts of Polypropylene (PP) and Polyethylene (PE) microplastics, of varying sizes (20 nm and 100 µm) and doses (100 and 1000 mg/kg), on tobacco plant growth. Over a 55-d exposure period, PP and PE MPs exhibited a dose-dependent effect on the growth of tobacco plants. Notably, both PE and PP exposures significantly suppressed plant height, as well as fresh and dry biomass, with PP demonstrating greater toxicity. However, an exception was observed in the PP treatment, with marginal yet notable increase in growth indicators was recorded at a 20 nm particle size under high-concentration exposure. Further investigations revealed that MPs exposure at varying concentrations negatively impacted photosynthetic activity and triggered oxidative stress in leaves, with higher-dose treatments leading to a more pronounced accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). To elucidate the molecular response mechanisms of tobacco leaves under PP-MP stress, a co-omics analysis was conducted. The analysis identified key pathways involved in the plant’s response to PP-MP stress, including plant hormone signal transduction, the MAPK signaling, flavonoid and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, and photosynthesis antenna proteins. A comprehensive assessment of genes and metabolites revealed significant alterations in the biosynthesis of several plant hormones and flavonoids, including auxin, cytokinin, abscisic acid (ABA), and jasmonic acid. These findings suggest that plastics may impair photosynthetic efficiency, alter hormonal responses, and cause redox imbalance, ultimately affecting plant growth and resilience. • Microplastics disrupt photosynthesis and trigger oxidative stress, inhibiting tobacco growth in a dose-dependent manner. • Integrated omics analysis reveals a strong link between MP exposure and disruptions in hormone biosynthesis and MAPK signaling. • MP toxicity induces significant transcriptomic and metabolomic shifts in leaves, altering plant metabolism. • MPs impair photosynthetic efficiency, potentially affecting plant energy dynamics and overall health.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper