We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastic prevalence in commercially available petfoods
Summary
Researchers tested 38 popular UK pet foods and found tiny plastic bits (microplastics) in most of them—76% of products had at least some contamination, with cheaper "value" brands testing worse than premium ones. A large dog eating wet food could swallow over 300 plastic particles a day, meaning our pets may be ingesting even more microplastic than we do, and their waste could be spreading this plastic pollution into soil and wildlife. While the direct health effects on pets aren't fully known yet, this is a good reminder that microplastic exposure is showing up in more places than we realized—including the food bowls of the animals we care
Plastic production has risen dramatically since the 1950s. While microplastic contamination of human food has been investigated, commercially available pet and wildlife foods have not. This could represent a contamination route for terrestrial ecosystems, via the faeces of pets and wild animals. We assessed 38 pet and hedgehog food products available in the U.K., covering a range of brands, price-brackets, and food types. Six 1 g replicates of dried material were tested per product, giving a total sample size of 228. Microplastics were found in 63 samples (27.6%). Of the 38 products, 76% were positive: 29% had one positive sample, and 47% had 2 or more. Most (84%) of the 19 brands tested were contaminated, with value products having more positive samples than mid-range and premium products. The most common polymers were polyester, polyacrylamide, polyethylene, and polypropylene. The mean concentration of microplastics was 0.4 pieces g-1 (SD = 0.84) for all the dry foods tested and 0.3 g-1 (SD = 0.62) in wet foods. Within samples that were plastic-positive, the concentrations were 1.6 pieces g-1 (SD = 0.73) and 1.2 piecesg-1 (SD = 0.53). Given their lower energy content, and correspondingly larger mass consumed, wet foods present the greatest exposure risk. Based on the mean microplastic content across all samples, a large dog (35 kg) fed wet foods is likely to ingest 313 microplastics day-1 (SD = 263.6). Microplastic concentrations in pet food were higher than those reported for human foods but lower than in wild invertebrates. However, pet foods had a greater proportion of positive samples, suggesting they may be an important contamination route for pets, wild mammals and terrestrial ecosystems. This study, therefore, reveals a previously unrecognised pathway for microplastics to enter the food chains of both pets and wild mammals.