0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Microplastic detection and characterization in different matrixes by computed tomography

The European Physical Journal Special Topics 2026
A. Teles, A. Almeida, D. Oliveira, R Domingos Da Costa Lopes

Summary

Scientists tested a new way to find and measure tiny plastic bits (microplastics) hiding in soil, using detailed 3D X-ray scans paired with computer prediction models. The method worked really well in simpler soils like sand, but struggled in complex, muddy environments like mangrove soil—showing that better tools are still needed to accurately track microplastic pollution in the varied environments where our food grows and ecosystems function. This matters because reliably detecting microplastics in soil is a key step toward understanding how much of this pollution ends up in our food and water supply.

Polymers

Abstract Microplastic (MP) pollution represents a growing environmental threat, particularly in terrestrial and coastal ecosystems. Characterizing MPs is challenging due to their heterogeneous shapes, sizes, and chemical compositions, as well as their interactions with complex environmental matrices. This study evaluates X-ray microtomography (microCT) combined with linear regression models (LRM), a machine learning approach within artificial intelligence (AI), for high-resolution detection and morphometric characterization of MPs in soils. Controlled experiments used sandy, humus-rich, and mangrove soils spiked with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fragments (~ 1 mm). MicroCT provided non-destructive three-dimensional imaging, from which volume, surface area, elongation, flatness, anisotropy, and sphericity were extracted. Image processing, including filtering and morphological corrections, enhanced particle delineation and data accuracy. LRMs predicted interdependent morphometric parameters, with performance assessed using mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and the coefficient of determination (R 2 ). Results showed high predictive accuracy for sandy and humus-rich soils (average R 2 ≈ 0.93–0.94), whereas mangrove soils exhibited lower and less stable performance (average R 2 ≈ 0.69), reflecting matrix heterogeneity. These findings indicate that soil properties strongly influence microCT-based MP characterization and that linear regression may be unreliable in complex matrices; however, combining high-resolution imaging with predictive modeling provides a more robust approach for accurately assessing MPs across diverse environments, supporting improved environmental monitoring and informing methodological strategies tailored to specific substrates.

Share this paper