We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Analysis of small microparticles from snow in Park City, Utah (USA): How much of it is plastic?
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists tested snow from a Utah ski resort and nearby mountains and found tiny plastic particles and fibers in every single sample — even at the highest, most remote spot, where levels were actually worse than in town. This suggests these tiny plastics are traveling through the air from far away, meaning even "pristine" snow you might ski on or that melts into drinking water supplies isn't free from plastic pollution, and levels seem to be climbing over time.
Abstract Microplastics (fragments < 5 mm) are increasingly studied around the world in a diversity of ecosystems. In contrast, small microplastics (1-100 microns in size) are subject to much less studies because of their small size, which makes them challenging to detect, and their ability to be both airborne and waterborne. Here, we performed epifluorescence imaging to detect small microplastics from fresh snow samples (50 mL) that were collected from 3 sites in the ski area and from 2 sites in the ski resort of Park City, UT, all exposed to different levels of traffic of people. Small microparticles concentrations ranged from 1,000–4,000/50 mL in the ski resort, whereas these numbers ranged from 30 to 3,000/50 mL in the ski area. Against expectations, the higher and most remote site contained the greatest concentrations of microparticles, which increased over the years for each site, as a possible sign to growing airborne sources, both at the local and global levels. As for microfibers concentrations, they ranged from 100 to 3,000/50 mL in the ski resort while these numbers were lower in the ski areas, ranging from 5 to 300/50 mL. These ranges remain similar across years for microfibers in the ski area as these concentrations in the snow seem to be dictated by the amount of snow fall. All the sites showed a percentage of different polymers, such as cotton (23%) and lyocell (20%), but also a variety of synthetic polymers, such as cellulose acetate (11%), nylon (11%), polyester and polyethylene terephthalate (11%), PVC (10%), polyethylene (8%), and tire wear rubber crumb (6%). In most cases, the small microparticles and microfibers were discolored in bright field (but they were seen in epifluorescence) and showing weathered surfaces in scanning electron microscopy, suggesting their far-away source.
More Papers Like This
Analysis of small microparticles from snow in Park City, Utah (USA): How much of it is plastic?
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers collected fresh snow from ski areas in Park City, Utah and found microplastic concentrations ranging from 30 to 4,000 particles per 50 mL sample, with surprisingly high concentrations even at remote high-altitude sites far from direct human activity. The findings demonstrate that atmospheric transport can carry microplastics to pristine mountain snowpack, highlighting their pervasive environmental reach.
Analysis of small microparticles from snow in Park City, Utah (USA): How much of it is plastic?
AI summary Read the abstract
Fresh snow samples from ski areas in Park City, Utah contained 1,000–4,000 small microparticles per 50 mL, with a mix of synthetic polymers (nylon, polyester, PVC, polyethylene) and natural fibers, and—surprisingly—higher concentrations at a more remote, higher-altitude site than at lower-elevation resort areas. The results suggest that atmospheric deposition is carrying microplastics to mountain snowpack regardless of local human activity, and that concentrations at the high-altitude site have increased over the study period. Snow is an important reservoir and transport medium for microplastics, and mountain snowmelt may be delivering these particles into downstream watersheds.
Microplastics deposited by snowfall in local and remote areas: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.
AI summary Read the abstract
Tiny plastic particles are falling from the sky with snow — even in remote, seemingly pristine places far from cities — though this analysis of 28 studies found snow near urban and industrial areas contains about six times more microplastics than snow in remote regions. This means plastic pollution isn't staying contained to obvious sources like cities or oceans; it's traveling through the atmosphere and settling into snowpack that feeds our drinking water, soil, and ecosystems, raising concerns about long-term exposure risks that scientists are still working to fully understand.
Does Winter Outdoor Recreational Traffic Impact Concentrations of Microplastics in Colorado's Snowpacks? International Snow Science Workshop 2026, Whistler, Canada
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists tested Colorado mountain snow for tiny plastic particles and found similar amounts whether the area had heavy ski traffic or none at all. This suggests microplastics are mainly falling from the air rather than coming from human activity, which matters since this snow eventually melts into drinking water for millions of people out West.
Event-Scale Deposition of Atmospheric Microplastics in the Snow of the Sierra Nevada, USA
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists found tiny plastic particles (microplastics) falling from the air and collecting in snow in California's Sierra Nevada mountains, even during single storm events. This matters because it shows microplastics are traveling through the atmosphere and settling in remote, seemingly pristine places far from cities, meaning the water we drink from snowmelt, and the air we breathe, may carry more plastic contamination than we realized.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.