0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Effects of Microplastic Contamination on Chemical and Microbiological Soil Properties

Microplastics 2026
Jonita Perfanova, Lev Tribis, Gergana Kuncheva, Momtchil Dimitrov, Hristo Valchovski, Veselinka Petrova, Milena Kercheva

Summary

Scientists found that common plastics like PP, PE, and PET (found in packaging and bottles) can throw soil out of balance when they break down into microplastics, harming beneficial soil microbes and reducing the nutrients plants need to grow. This matters because healthy soil is the foundation of our food supply — and different soil types react differently to plastic pollution, meaning the crops we depend on could be affected in ways that vary by region and farmland type.

Microplastic pollution threatens soil health by disrupting chemical and microbial balances and impairing nutrient cycling, with effects that vary depending on soil properties. The objective of this study is to determine the effects of contamination with three types of microplastics (<5 mm)—polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET)—on the microbiological and chemical parameters of four soil types in Bulgaria: Calcic Chernozem, Vertisol, Luvisol, and Fluvisol. A controlled 180-day laboratory incubation experiment was performed, where each soil type was contaminated with microplastics at three concentrations to monitor changes in key microbiological and chemical properties. It was established that microplastics contamination suppressed abundance of key microbial groups and limited nutrient availability, inducing a state of biological and chemical imbalance in the soil. PET exerted the strongest impact on soil chemical properties, with the agrochemical properties of Fluvisol being the most sensitive to MP contamination. PE and PET had the greatest influence on microbial communities, with Vertisol and Luvisol being the most affected in this regard. PP contamination altered key metabolic processes, with the specific impact being highly dependent on soil type and most pronounced in Chernozem. Furthermore, the concentration influenced the measured parameters, with the effects varying depending on the soil type and the microplastic type. Among the factors influencing soil responses to microplastic contamination, soil type appears to be the most decisive, followed by the type of microplastic.

Share this paper