We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Insights into effects of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on organic nitrogen mineralization in marsh soil
No summary available — this paper's abstract is not included in the open metadata provided by the publisher. Learn why →
More Papers Like This
Distinct Influence of Conventional and Biodegradable Microplastics on Soil Microorganisms and Nitrogen Cycling: Emphasizing the Effect of Biodegradable Polylactic Acid
AI summary Read the abstract
A one-month soil experiment comparing polyethylene, PVC, and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics found that smaller particles and PLA had the greatest disruptive effects on bacterial diversity, nitrogen cycling, and enzyme activity, inhibiting nitrification while enhancing denitrification. The finding that biodegradable plastics can be equally or more disruptive to soil microbiomes than conventional plastics complicates assumptions that they represent a safe environmental alternative.
The Effect of N Mineralization, Nitrification and Ammonification Rates in Soils Contaminated with Microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that polypropylene, polyethylene, and PET microplastics all disrupt soil nitrogen cycling, with polypropylene having the most harmful effect — reducing the availability of nitrogen that plants need to grow, raising concerns about long-term agricultural soil health in contaminated areas.
Comparative study of the effects of pristine and aged PBAT microplastics on soil microbial community composition and nitrogen transformation
AI summary Read the abstract
Pristine and UV-aged PBAT biodegradable microplastics both altered soil nitrogen cycling, boosting microbial biomass and nitrogen-fixing bacteria while significantly suppressing nitrification rates by up to 68%, with UV aging moderating some of these effects. The finding that biodegradable plastics still disrupt key soil nutrient pathways challenges the assumption that they are environmentally benign alternatives to conventional plastics.
Effects of Conventional and Biodegradable Microplastics on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Microorganisms
AI summary Read the abstract
A four-month soil incubation experiment compared conventional polyethylene (PE) and biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) microplastics, finding both alter soil organic carbon, nitrogen availability, enzyme activity, and microbial community composition — with PLA causing distinct effects due to its degradability. The finding that biodegradable plastics still significantly disrupt soil microbiology challenges assumptions about their environmental safety and suggests replacing conventional plastics with PLA does not eliminate ecological harm.
Source, Environmental Behavior and Ecological Impact of Biodegradable Microplastics in Soil Ecosystems: A Review
AI summary Read the abstract
This review finds that biodegradable plastics do not fully break down as commonly assumed—they fragment into microplastics that alter soil chemistry, disrupt microbial communities, harm soil organisms, and amplify the toxicity of co-occurring pollutants. The widespread adoption of biodegradable plastics as an environmental solution may be creating a new category of soil microplastic contamination with its own distinct ecological risks.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.