We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
From inhibition to recovery: metabolic rebound of Microcystis aeruginosa following pulse exposure to polystyrene nanoplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Tiny plastic particles (nanoplastics) can seriously damage a common algae's ability to grow and make energy, but the algae can bounce back surprisingly well once the plastics are removed. This matters because these algae are the base of aquatic food chains, so understanding their recovery helps us predict how nanoplastic pollution might affect entire ecosystems and the fish and plants we rely on for food and water quality.
Nanoplastics (NPs) are an emerging global environmental concern. While extensive research has focused on the toxicological effects of NPs on microalgae, the post-exposure consequences remain largely unexplored. In this study, Microcystis aeruginosa was exposed to 5 and 50 mg/L of polystyrene (PS) for 15 days, followed by a 15-day post-exposure period in PS-free medium. Exposure to 5 mg/L PS did not significantly affect growth, phycobiliprotein content, or oxidative stress responses. In contrast, 50 mg/L PS significantly inhibited algal growth and impaired photosynthetic capacity. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that this toxicity was underpinned by a broad downregulation of central energy metabolism, including photosynthesis, glycolysis, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, and oxidative phosphorylation. Notably, following the removal of PS, M. aeruginosa exhibited a remarkable recovery capacity driven by metabolic rebound. This was manifested as a robust upregulation of previously suppressed pathways, particularly the pentose phosphate pathway and oxidative phosphorylation, facilitating a substantial, though potentially incomplete, restoration of physiological function. These findings highlight the metabolic resilience of M. aeruginosa and underscore the importance of considering post-exposure phases in ecological risk assessments of NPs.
More Papers Like This
Post-exposure recovery of Microcystis aeruginosa from nanoplastics stress: metabolic adaptation and damage resilience
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers exposed Microcystis aeruginosa cyanobacteria to polystyrene nanoplastics for 15 days, then transferred them to NP-free medium to study post-exposure recovery. Toxicity was concentration-dependent during exposure, and cells showed metabolic changes and only partial recovery after removal, suggesting persistent effects on cyanobacterial physiology.
Responses of Microcystis aeruginosa to polystyrene microplastics: Growth dynamics and implications for water treatment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers studied how polystyrene microplastics affect the harmful freshwater algae Microcystis aeruginosa, which causes toxic algal blooms. They found that while microplastics initially suppressed algae growth, the algae eventually adapted and grew even more, producing higher levels of the dangerous toxin microcystin. The study suggests that microplastic pollution in freshwater could worsen harmful algal blooms and create additional water treatment challenges.
Responses of bloom-forming Microcystis aeruginosa to polystyrene microplastics exposure: Growth and photosynthesis
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers exposed bloom-forming blue-green algae (Microcystis aeruginosa) to polystyrene microplastics and found a complex pattern: high concentrations (50–100 mg/L) temporarily suppressed growth and photosynthesis in the middle of the experiment, but promoted growth at the beginning and end. This suggests microplastics could worsen harmful algal blooms in the long run, which is concerning because these blooms produce toxins that contaminate drinking water.
Evaluating physiological responses of microalgae towards environmentally coexisting microplastics: A meta-analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
A meta-analysis of 52 studies found that microplastics inhibit microalgal growth and photosynthesis and induce oxidative damage, though microalgae can recover over time. Cyanobacteria are more vulnerable than green algae, and the relative size of microplastics to algal cells governs the mechanism of impact, while aged versus pristine microplastics have opposite effects on extracellular polymeric substance and microcystin production.
Microcystis aeruginosa copes with toxic effects of micro/nano-plastics with varying particle sizes through different self-regulatory mechanisms
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers exposed the freshwater cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa to polystyrene particles of three different sizes ranging from nanoscale to microscale. All particle sizes harmed the algae, but they triggered different cellular defense mechanisms depending on their size, with nanoparticles causing the most severe damage. The findings reveal that particle size is a key factor in determining how microplastics affect aquatic microorganisms.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.