We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Direct Evidencefor the Carrier Effect of Nanoplasticsin Plants via In Situ Mass Spectrometry Imaging
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists used a special imaging technique to directly watch tiny plastic particles (nanoplastics) travel through a plant, and found that harmful chemical additives—like flame retardants—hitch a ride along with them, moving further into the plant than they would on their own. This "carrier effect" means that when nanoplastics get into crops, they may drag toxic chemicals deeper into edible plant tissue, raising new concerns about how microplastic pollution could increase our exposure to harmful additives through food.
To provide the direct evidence for comigration of plastic particles and additives in organisms, for the first time, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI) was employed to obtain in situ imaging characterization of the migration behaviors of nanoplastics (NPs) and additives in potted cactus stems. When polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-NPs) loaded with the antioxidant tris(2,4-di-tert-butylphenyl) phosphite (AO168) and flame retardant diphenyl phosphate (DPhP) were continuously exposed directly to the pith for 7 days, the additives comigrated with PS-NPs upward along stems. On the low cross-section, concentrations of PS, AO168 and DPhP were 84.8 ± 7.3, 1.5 ± 0.1, and 7.1 ± 1.9 μg/cm2, respectively; the corresponding values on the high cross-section were 7.4 ± 0.8, 1.4 ± 0.1 and 3.8 ± 0.2 μg/cm2. In contrast, AO168 and DPhP were undetectable in high cross sections of the PS-NPs-free control under identical exposure levels. The mapping degrees of additives to PS-NPs decline from 63.1% at low cross-section to 1.0% at high cross-section, indicating progressive dissociation during translocation. In vitro experiments demonstrated that PS loading can significantly reduce the degradation efficiency of additives within the cactus bleeding sap. The PS-NPs entering the stems exert a carrier effect, thereby facilitating the long-distance translocation of additives to distal plant tissues.
More Papers Like This
Direct Evidence for the Carrier Effect of Nanoplastics in Plants via In Situ Mass Spectrometry Imaging
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists used a special imaging technique to directly watch tiny plastic particles (nanoplastics) travel through a plant's stem, and found they can act like tiny taxis—carrying harmful chemical additives (like flame retardants) along with them to parts of the plant far from where the plastic first entered. This matters because it suggests that when plants absorb nanoplastics from contaminated soil or water, they may also be pulling in and spreading extra toxic chemicals throughout the plant, which raises questions about what ends up in the fruits, vegetables, or crops we eventually eat.
Tracking Nano- and Microplastics in Plants: Uptake Pathways, Tissue Distribution, and Analytical Strategies from Microscopy to Spectroscopy
AI summary Read the abstract
Tiny plastic particles from soil, water, and air can get absorbed by plant roots and leaves, then travel through the plant into stems and leaves we eventually eat, and evidence suggests this can stress plants by damaging photosynthesis and causing cell damage. This review rounds up the science on how researchers detect these plastic particles in plant tissue, noting it's still tricky to tell plastic bits apart from normal plant material under the microscope. The bigger takeaway for consumers: since crops can take up these particles from contaminated environments, understanding this process is a key step toward figuring out how much plastic might be ending up on our
Multimodal imaging and quantification of lanthanide chelate-labeled micro- and nanoplastics in plants
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists have developed a better way to track how tiny plastic particles move through plants—from roots to leaves—by using special glowing chemical tags that don't get washed out by the plant's natural background glow, unlike older tracking methods. This matters because microplastics in our food supply are a growing concern, and understanding exactly how they get into the crops we eat (like wheat and lettuce) is a key step toward figuring out whether—and how much—they end up on our dinner plates.
Pathways of micro- and nanoplastics transfer from plants to animals in the food chain
AI summary Read the abstract
This review pulls together what scientists currently know about tiny plastic particles moving from soil into plants, and potentially up the food chain to animals and humans. While plants can absorb these particles through their roots, researchers still aren't sure how much actually ends up on our plates or what it means for our health, more real-world studies are needed.
Micro/Nanoplastics in Agriculture: Uptake, Translocation and Bioaccumulation in Plants and Their Ecological Implications
AI summary Read the abstract
Tiny plastic particles from pollution are building up in farm soils and getting absorbed by plants through their roots, then traveling up into the leaves, fruits, and other parts we eat. This review of existing research shows these plastics can interfere with how plants grow and take up nutrients, and their presence in edible crops raises real concerns about how much plastic might be ending up on our dinner plates. Scientists still need better, standardized tools to detect these particles and develop ways to keep them out of our food supply.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.