We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Biomonitoring Environmental Contaminants in Aquatic Ecosystems: A One Health Perspective
AI summary Read the abstract
Fish, birds, and shellfish living in our lakes, rivers, and oceans are like early-warning systems for pollution—when scientists study the plastics, heavy metals, and chemicals building up in these animals, it reveals what's likely ending up in our water and food supply too. This review found surprisingly few studies (just 14) have connected the dots between wildlife pollution and human health, even though microplastics were the most commonly studied contaminant. The takeaway: we need more research linking environmental contamination in animals to human health risks, since what accumulates in fish and waterbirds today may be a preview of what affects us tomorrow.
Introduction: Aquatic ecosystems are major reservoirs for both legacy and emerging contaminants, facilitating their distribution throughout the environment and bioaccumulation across different trophic levels. As such, wildlife acts as a valuable tool for biomonitoring these contaminants and serves as a key indicator of environmental pollution within the One Health framework. Despite this, knowledge regarding the application of this framework alongside the assessment of aquatic contaminants using wildlife species remains fragmented. Objective: This study aims to synthesize current evidence on aquatic contaminants using wildlife as sentinels of environmental pollution and to explore how the One Health concept is applied in this field. Methodology: A systematic database search was conducted in SCOPUS, and the retrieved studies were screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as their relevance to the One Health concept. Results: Despite its timely relevance, only fourteen studies have adopted the One Health approach to assess contaminants in aquatic species. The selected studies focused mainly on plastic particles (53.33%), such as macro- and microplastics; heavy metals (26.67%), such as mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), Nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), and selenium (Se); persistent organic pollutants (13.33%), such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and dioxin/furans; and metalloid (6.67%) arsenic (As). These contaminants were evaluated across four different taxonomic groups: fishes (61.54%), waterbirds (23.08%), mollusks (7.69%) and crustaceans (7.69%). Most studies were conducted in Portugal (37.5%) and the United States of America (18.75%), whereas other countries, including Canada, Australia, Ecuador, Mexico, Indonesia, and Turkey, were mentioned in only one study each (6.25%). Conclusions: Monitoring levels of contaminants in wildlife is essential not only to understand the dynamics of environmental pollution, but also to preserve the integrity of ecosystems while safeguarding animal and human health. However, the limited number of studies adopting a One Health perspective results in an incomplete representation of contaminant classes and affected taxa. These findings highlight the urgent need to expand wildlife-based monitoring strategies within a One Health framework, aiming to improve environmental risk assessment and deepen our understanding of the impacts of pollution across ecosystems, animals and humans.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics as Emerging One Health Threats: A Molecular and Ecotoxicological Review Across Aquatic Life with Emphasis on Fish
AI summary Read the abstract
This review pulls together existing research showing that tiny plastic particles polluting our water can seriously harm fish, damaging their organs, disrupting hormones, and even carrying toxic hitchhikers like heavy metals and pesticides deeper into their bodies. Since these contaminated fish end up in the food we eat, and microplastics are also found in our water, air, and soil, this pollution likely affects human health too — though more research is needed to fully understand the risks. The authors argue we need coordinated global action treating animal, environmental, and human health as connected (called "One Health") to tackle this growing problem.
Sentinel species selection for monitoring microplastic pollution: A review on one health approach
AI summary Read the abstract
This review evaluates how sentinel species, organisms used as biological indicators, can be selected to monitor microplastic pollution across different environments using a One Health approach that connects ecosystem, animal, and human health. Researchers assessed various candidate species including mussels, fish, and birds based on their ability to accumulate and reflect microplastic contamination. The study provides a framework for choosing the most informative species to track plastic pollution's impact across interconnected ecosystems.
A One Health perspective on water contaminants
AI summary Read the abstract
This review applied the One Health framework to water contaminants including microplastics, pathogens, and agrochemicals, emphasizing the interconnected impacts of water pollution on human, animal, and environmental health.
A review on effects of microplastics on animal, environment and human health considering One Health perspective
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines the effects of microplastics on animal, environmental, and human health from a One Health perspective, highlighting how microplastic contamination interconnects ecological, animal, and human health systems.
Monitoring Chemical Environmental Hazards Through Wildlife Assessment: A Review Within the “One Health” Approach
AI summary Read the abstract
Wildlife species serve as sentinels for chemical contamination including microplastics, metals, and pesticides within the One Health framework, yet systematic monitoring of game meat for these pollutants remains rare. Because microplastics have been detected in wild animals consumed as food, this review underscores the need for standardized surveillance to protect human health through the food chain.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.