0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Effect of microplastics from lithium-ion battery waste on lithium carbonate recovery and crystallization behavior

Waste Management 2026
Anna Zaykovskaya, Alexandre Chagnes, Kerstin Forsberg

Summary

Scientists found that tiny plastic bits left over from recycled lithium-ion batteries (like phone or EV batteries) can mess with the process used to recover lithium for reuse, causing it to form smaller, clumpier crystals that are harder to filter out of the liquid. This is a recycling engineering study, not a human health study, so it doesn't tell us anything about health effects of microplastics — but it does matter because it shows these plastic contaminants can make battery recycling less efficient, which is important as we try to build a more sustainable, less wasteful battery supply chain.

Polymers

Microplastic residues originating from lithium-ion battery components, including hydrophobic binder-derived poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) and separator-derived polyethylene (PE), are increasingly encountered in hydrometallurgical recycling streams, yet their impact on downstream lithium recovery remains largely unexplored. This study systematically investigates their influence on the reactive crystallization of lithium carbonate (Li 2 CO 3 ) from aqueous lithium sulfate (Li 2 SO 4 ) solutions. Precipitation at 80 °C was conducted at controlled polymer loadings (0.01–1.0 wt%), and crystallization kinetics, particle size distribution, filtration behavior, yield, and crystal morphology were evaluated using in situ monitoring, laser diffraction, and microscopy. PVDF markedly modified crystallization behavior, slightly reducing the turbidity onset times and promoting the formation of significantly finer particles, which led to a pronounced deterioration in filtration performance at higher loadings. Microscopy revealed that Li 2 CO 3 crystallites preferentially nucleated and grew on PVDF surfaces, forming dense agglomerated structures rather than the larger, well-defined individual crystals observed in polymer-free systems. In contrast, PE exhibited similar but substantially weaker effects, with no clear evidence of surface-mediated nucleation. Despite these pronounced changes in crystal size, morphology, and separation behavior, the final Li 2 CO 3 yield remained within 68–80% across all systems, with only a modest non-monotonic dependence on polymer loading. These findings demonstrate that hydrophobic polymer microplastics can act as effective heterogeneous nucleation sites, fundamentally altering crystallization pathways and downstream solid–liquid separation without significantly affecting equilibrium yield. The results highlight an overlooked process-level impact of microplastic contaminants and underscore the necessity of accounting for such impurities in the design and optimization of lithium-ion battery recycling flowsheets.

Share this paper