0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Divergent composite contamination of pesticides on conventional and biodegradable agricultural microplastics and their contrasting toxic effects

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers grew alfalfa in pesticide-contaminated soil containing either conventional polyethylene or biodegradable polybutylene succinate microplastics and found that biodegradable particles caused more severe toxicity by adsorbing more pesticide and acting as root-retention agents that shifted distribution away from leaves while amplifying oxidative damage and disrupting photosynthesis.

Polymers

The widespread use of agricultural plastic films has transformed farmland soil into a major microplastic (MP) reservoir. While biodegradable MPs are promoted as environmentally friendly alternatives, their fragmentation behavior and interactions with coexisting contaminants, such as pesticides, remain poorly understood-particularly in comparison with conventional MPs. To address this knowledge gap, we systematically compared the composite pollution behavior and phytotoxicity of conventional polyethylene (PE-MPs) and biodegradable polybutylene succinate (PBS-MPs) in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) grown in pesticide-contaminated soil, with a focus on elucidating the underlying mechanisms through physiological and transcriptomic analyses. Our results demonstrated that both MPs induced phytotoxicity, but PBS-MPs caused significantly more severe effects than PE-MPs. Mechanistically, PBS-MPs exhibited stronger pesticide adsorption capacity, leading to greater pesticide accumulation in roots. Importantly, we uncovered a dual role of MPs: they acted as "carriers" facilitating pesticide uptake into roots, while simultaneously functioning as "immobilizers" that retained pesticide-MP complexes in root tissues, thereby limiting translocation to leaves. This "carrier-immobilization" effect resulted in a shift of pesticide distribution from a "leaf-accumulation pattern" (in controls) to a "root-retention pattern" (in MP treatments). The enhanced root retention of pesticides in PBS-MP treatments exacerbated oxidative damage in both roots and leaves, disrupted osmotic homeostasis, and induced photosynthetic inhibition characterized by impaired light harvesting, electron transport, and photophosphorylation, which triggered photoprotective responses. At the molecular level, alfalfa activated starch/sucrose metabolism and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathways to cope with the combined stress. Collectively, this study provides novel mechanistic insights into how biodegradable MPs, due to their intrinsic physicochemical properties, may pose higher ecological risks than conventional MPs by acting as more efficient contaminant carriers while simultaneously altering pollutant fate in plants. These findings challenge the prevailing perception of biodegradable plastics as inherently environmentally.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Interactions of traditional and biodegradable microplastics with neonicotinoid pesticides

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated how both traditional and biodegradable microplastics interact with neonicotinoid pesticides in agricultural environments. They found that all microplastic types could adsorb the pesticide thiacloprid, but biodegradable microplastics showed different sorption behavior and higher desorption rates compared to conventional plastics. The study suggests that biodegradable microplastics may actually increase pesticide mobility in soils, creating a previously unrecognized pathway for agricultural chemical contamination.

Article Tier 2

Divergent impacts of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on pesticide fate and toxicity in a soil–chive system, underscoring a soil-plant-microbe disruption

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found that biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) microplastics, despite being marketed as eco-friendly, significantly delayed pesticide degradation in soil and increased plant uptake of a toxic pesticide metabolite by up to 59%. PLA disrupted beneficial soil bacteria and interfered with plant detoxification pathways, while conventional polyethylene microplastics had comparatively milder effects. The study suggests that biodegradable plastics may pose unexpected risks when they interact with pesticides in agricultural soils.

Article Tier 2

Adsorption of neonicotinoid insecticides by mulch film-derived microplastics and their combined toxicity

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers studied how microplastics from agricultural mulch films interact with common insecticides used on crops. They found that biodegradable plastic (PBAT) microplastics adsorbed more pesticide than conventional polyethylene microplastics, and that aging increased this adsorption capacity. When combined, the microplastics and insecticides were more toxic to soil organisms than either pollutant alone, suggesting an underappreciated risk in agricultural soils.

Article Tier 2

Impact of different microplastics polymers and albendazole and pyraclostrobin mix on arugula (Eruca vesicaria) physiology and growth

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed arugula plants to conventional (LDPE) and biodegradable (PBAT) microplastics combined with a pesticide-antiparasitic mixture, and found that only the conventional plastic significantly amplified the chemicals' toxicity, reducing plant growth more than either pollutant alone. This shows that conventional microplastics can act as carriers that worsen the effects of agricultural chemicals in soil.

Article Tier 2

Distinct interferences of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on adsorption of pesticide mixture in agricultural soils

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers examined how conventional and biodegradable microplastics alter pesticide adsorption dynamics in agricultural soils, finding that the surface properties of microplastics — particularly their affinity coefficients — were the dominant factor governing pesticide fate, introducing significant complexity and uncertainty into predictions of pesticide environmental risk.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper