We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Earthworms as Integrative Bioindicators of Soil Health in Agroecosystems under Chemical and Plastic Stress
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers synthesized evidence from 2000–2026 showing that earthworms serve as sensitive early-warning indicators of agroecosystem health under combined stressors including pesticides and microplastics, with a meta-analysis of 2,124 observations revealing reduced survival, elevated oxidative stress, and impaired gut microbial diversity — and finding that biodegradable plastics were not necessarily less harmful than conventional ones.
Agricultural soil health assessment continues to focus heavily on chemical fertility despite the fact that soil functioning is highly mediated by biological communities and the structures they form. The earthworms are the only useful indicators in that they are sensitive to disturbance and also control aggregation, porosity, residue turnover, nutrient mineralization, and microbial habitats. This review is a synthesis of evidence on earthworms as integrative bioindicators of the state of agroecosystems under synthetic pesticides, plastic residues and microplastics, and biopesticide-based management. Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar were searched systematically to identify studies published between 2000 and early 2026 that correlated earthworm measures with soil functions. Recent synthesis shows that earthworms are involved in approximately 6.5 percent of the world grain production and 2.3 percent of the legume production, highlighting their agronomic importance (Fonte et al., 2023). In pesticide research, the most common negative effects are reproduction, behavior, growth, and biochemical biomarkers; a general hazard assessment found negative responses in 87.7% of earthworm survival parameters, 82.7% of reproduction parameters, and 80.6% of behavioral parameters in laboratory exposure conditions (Gunstone et al., 2021). In the case of microplastics, a recent meta-analysis of 2,124 observations of 102 articles revealed a decrease in survival and growth, increased oxidative stress, and impaired gut microbial diversity, and biodegradable polymers were not necessarily less harmful than conventional plastics (Zhong et al., 2026). In comparison, existing data on biopesticides tends to indicate reduced non-target interference at recommended concentrations, but formulation impacts and multiple applications are not well-investigated. The literature suggests that abundance and biomass continue to be valuable field diagnostics, but reproduction, avoidance behavior, and function-related measures like aggregate stability and enzyme activity give earlier and more mechanistic warning signals. It is suggested to use an earthworm-based indicator panel in intensified tropical and subtropical agroecosystems, especially in the context of Indian agroecosystems where pesticide inputs and agricultural plastics are becoming more and more co-located.
More Papers Like This
Earthworms as Integrative Bioindicators of Soil Health in Agroecosystems under Chemical and Plastic Stress
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers synthesized evidence from 2000–2026 showing that earthworms serve as sensitive early-warning indicators of agroecosystem health under combined stressors including pesticides and microplastics, with a meta-analysis of 2,124 observations revealing reduced survival, elevated oxidative stress, and impaired gut microbial diversity — and finding that biodegradable plastics were not necessarily less harmful than conventional ones.
Earthworm-microbiome interactions: Unlocking next-generation bioindicators and bioengineered solutions for soil and environmental health
AI summary Read the abstract
This review explores how earthworms and their associated microbiomes can serve as bioindicators of soil contamination from pollutants including microplastics. Changes in earthworm gut microbial communities can act as early warning signals of soil pollution, and engineered earthworm-microbiome systems show potential for environmental remediation. The study suggests that understanding these biological interactions could lead to new biomonitoring tools for assessing microplastic contamination in terrestrial ecosystems.
Multi-level biomarker responses in Eisenia fetida co-exposed to PE-MPs and DiBP: An ecological risk assessment based on physiological, biochemical, and molecular indicators
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists found that when microplastics from farm plastic sheeting combine with a common plastic-softening chemical (DiBP) in soil, they cause worse damage to earthworms than either pollutant alone—harming their cells, DNA, and organs. This matters because these same plastics and chemicals are widespread in soil where our food grows, and earthworms are a key indicator of soil health, so damage to them could signal broader risks to the food chain and environment we depend on.
Meta-analysis reveals contrasting effects of biodegradable and conventional microplastics on earthworm fitness, physiology, and gut microbiota
AI summary Read the abstract
A large analysis of over 100 studies found that both regular plastic pollution and "biodegradable" plastics harm earthworms, shrinking their survival, growth, and gut bacteria, while causing cell damage from oxidative stress. The key takeaway: switching to biodegradable plastics doesn't actually protect these important soil creatures, so it's not a guilt-free fix. Since earthworms keep soil healthy for growing our food, this matters for the whole food chain, including us, and it's a reminder that "biodegradable" labels don't always mean "harmless."
Bioindicators of the impacts by microplastics in soil: A Systematic Review : a systematic review
AI summary Read the abstract
This systematic review identifies organisms that can serve as bioindicators — living warning signs — for microplastic contamination in soil. Certain earthworms, springtails, and other soil creatures show measurable changes when exposed to microplastics, making them useful tools for monitoring pollution levels. Using these natural indicators could help farmers and environmental managers detect microplastic problems before they worsen.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.