We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Advances in research on the pathogenesis and signaling pathways associated with postoperative delirium (Review)
Summary
This review examines the causes and biological pathways behind postoperative delirium, a common complication especially in older patients, involving neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and gut-brain signaling. While not focused on microplastics, several pathways discussed, such as neuroinflammation and the gut-brain axis, overlap with mechanisms through which microplastics may affect brain health. Understanding these pathways helps explain how environmental pollutants could contribute to cognitive problems.
Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common postoperative complication, characterized by acute, transient and fluctuating declines in consciousness and attention, with an incidence that increases with age. POD is associated with various adverse postoperative outcomes, including prolonged hospital stays, higher medical costs and increased morbidity and mortality rates. Moreover, it has been suggested that POD, as an early manifestation of postoperative cognitive impairment, may serve as a precursor to long‑term cognitive dysfunction. Given its considerable clinical impact, the prevention and management of POD are of critical importance. However, the mechanisms underlying POD remain insufficiently understood. Current hypotheses primarily implicate neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, neurotransmitter dysregulation and pathological protein changes, such as β‑amyloid deposition and tau hyperphosphorylation. Disruptions in the sleep‑wake cycle, electroencephalographic burst suppression, the microbiota‑gut‑brain axis, the olfactory‑brain axis and genetic susceptibility to delirium may also contribute to POD occurrence. Multiple signaling pathways are involved in POD, including the Wnt/β‑catenin, PI3K/AKT, brain‑derived neurotrophic factor/tropomyosin receptor kinase B, toll‑like receptor and NF‑κB pathways. These findings not only elucidate potential mechanisms but also highlight essential therapeutic targets and theoretical foundations for clinical management. However, due to the complexity and multifactorial nature of the pathogenesis of POD, no comprehensive or widely accepted clinical measures have yet been established for its prevention and treatment. Both non‑pharmacological and pharmacological interventions have a role in POD prevention and treatment. Non‑pharmacological strategies are currently prioritized, such as cognitive training, the Hospital Elder Life Program and comprehensive geriatric assessment. Pharmacological interventions include dexmedetomidine, melatonin and non‑steroidal anti‑inflammatory drugs, with intranasal insulin emerging as a promising preventive approach. Additionally, anesthesia management strategies, including depth of anesthesia monitoring, blood pressure regulation and multimodal postoperative analgesia, have also been recognized as effective measures for reducing the risk of POD. The present review provides a comprehensive overview of the pathogenesis of POD, relevant signaling pathways and available preventive and therapeutic strategies. By deepening the understanding of POD, the present review aims to offer practical guidance for clinicians in optimizing prevention and management approaches.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Mechanistic insight of neurodegeneration due to micro/nano-plastic-induced gut dysbiosis.
This review provided mechanistic insight into how micro/nano-plastic-induced gut dysbiosis drives neurodegeneration, tracing a pathway from intestinal microbiome disruption to neuroinflammation and brain damage. It identified the gut-brain axis as the critical link between plastic particle exposure and progressive neurodegenerative conditions.
The Role of Emerging Environmental Contaminants on Alzheimer’s Disease
This review examined the role of emerging environmental contaminants, including microplastics, in the development and progression of Alzheimer's disease. The authors discussed mechanisms including oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and blood-brain barrier disruption as potential pathways linking environmental exposures to AD pathogenesis.
Alzheimer’s disease: the role of extrinsic factors in its development, an investigation of the environmental enigma
This review examines how environmental contaminants, including microplastics, may contribute to Alzheimer's disease risk. Along with air pollutants, toxic metals, and pesticides, plastics and microplastics are identified as potential risk factors that may promote brain inflammation and neurodegeneration. The review explores the molecular mechanisms behind these effects and suggests strategies to reduce the brain health impacts of environmental contaminants.
The role of microplastics exposure in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease
Researchers reviewed the mechanistic links between microplastic and nanoplastic exposure and the two most common neurodegenerative diseases — Alzheimer's and Parkinson's — finding evidence that oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, blood-brain barrier disruption, and protein aggregation are key pathways connecting plastic pollution to neurodegeneration.
From exposure to neurotoxicity induced by micro-nanoplastics with brain accumulation and cognitive decline
This review synthesizes evidence that micro- and nanoplastics can reach the brain by crossing the blood-brain barrier or traveling along nerve pathways, accumulating in regions critical for memory and thinking. Animal studies show that chronic exposure leads to cognitive problems, behavioral changes, and brain changes resembling neurodegenerative diseases, driven by oxidative stress, inflammation, and disruption of the gut-brain connection. The findings raise concern that long-term human exposure to nanoplastics through food and air could contribute to cognitive decline and neurological disease.