0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Biodegradable and conventional microplastics affect soil-plant systems through altering microbial community assembly and functions

Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology 2026

Summary

"Biodegradable" plastics are often marketed as the eco-friendly choice, but this study found that when they break down into microplastics in soil, they actually harm plant growth and soil health more than regular plastics like polyethylene do, by disrupting the soil bacteria that plants depend on for nutrients. This matters because these microplastics could end up in the crops we eat, and it suggests that switching to "biodegradable" plastics isn't automatically a safer bet for our food supply without more research into how they actually break down in real farm soil.

Microplastics pose a serious threat to the stability of agricultural ecosystems by disrupting soil element cycling and plant growth. However, the extent and mechanisms of these impacts depend on microplastic biodegradability and remain poorly understood. Here, we conducted a mesocosm experiment to evaluate the influences of a biodegradable microplastic (poly(butylene adipate- co -butylene terephthalate), PBAT) and three conventional microplastics with distinct side-chain structures (polystyrene, PS; polyethylene, PE; polypropylene, PP) on soil–plant systems. We found that PBAT exerted more severe phytotoxic effects than conventional microplastics, leading to pronounced reductions in shoot height and root length, alongside the greatest declines in soil nitrate nitrogen. While conventional microplastics increased bacterial diversity and network robustness, PBAT fundamentally reshaped community assembly by reducing the importance of drift and homogeneous selection while intensifying dispersal limitation, thereby narrowing the ecological niche breadth. These assembly shifts were accompanied by distinct bacterial colonizers: PBAT enriched putative plastic-degrading taxa, whereas conventional microplastics favored oligotrophic groups with diminished element-cycling capacities. Structural equation modelling further confirmed that microplastic biodegradability exerted direct negative effects on soil nutrients and plant growth. Collectively, our findings uncover type-dependent microbial mechanisms linking microplastic properties to soil–plant ecosystem function, highlighting that biodegradable microplastics can exert stronger negative effects than conventional ones through distinct microbial assembly pathways. • PB altered bacterial assembly via dispersal limitation and reduced niche breadth. • Conventional plastics enhanced bacterial diversity and network robustness. • Conventional microplastics favor oligotrophic groups with weaker element cycling functions. • The biodegradability of microplastics is negatively correlated with plant growth.

Share this paper