We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Data Sheet 1_Impact of polyethylene terephthalate nanoplastics (PET) on fibroblasts: a study on NIH-3T3 cells.pdf
Summary
PET nanoplastics were found to significantly affect NIH-3T3 fibroblast cells in vitro, inducing cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, and DNA damage, highlighting the potential health risks of nanoplastic exposure to connective tissue cells.
Plastic pollution has become a major environmental and public health issue due to rising global production. Nanoplastics (NPs) are especially concerning due to their widespread presence and potential health risks. This study aims to determine the impact of the exposure to polyethylene terephthalate (PET) NPs on fibroblast cells using the murine NIH-3T3 cells as experimental model. This is a relevant cellular model for several biological fields of application, including cell migration in wound healing and tissue regeneration. The PET NPs used represented an environmentally realistic PET NPs model since they were produced by a fast top down approach in a process close to the mechanical abrasion of microplastics occurring in the environment. They were characterized by an intrinsic autofluorescence which enables their use in studies of NPs interactions with biological systems without the need for additional fluorescent dyes. Additionally, the Hansen solubility parameters (HSP) of the PET NPs and the culture medium were determined to better understand their interaction. PET NPs were internalized by fibroblasts in a dose-dependent manner, localizing in the cytoplasm. While they caused only a slight reduction in cell viability (within 20% inhibition at 10–100 μg/mL) after 24 h exposure, they significantly impaired fibroblast migration, as demonstrated by the scratch assay, indicating possible interference in tissue repair. The exposure of the cells to PET NPs induced a significant dose-dependent ROS increase suggesting the induction of intracellular oxidative stress as possible mechanisms underlying the observed migration impairment. These findings highlight the potential risks of PET NPs to fibroblasts, emphasizing the need for further research into their impact on cellular functions and mechanisms.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Impact of polyethylene terephthalate nanoplastics (PET) on fibroblasts: a study on NIH-3T3 cells
Researchers exposed mouse fibroblast cells (important for wound healing and tissue repair) to PET nanoplastics made through a process that mimics real-world plastic breakdown. The nanoplastics entered the cells and significantly impaired their ability to migrate and close wounds, even at concentrations that caused only mild reductions in cell survival. This suggests that nanoplastic exposure could interfere with the body's ability to heal wounds and repair damaged tissue.
Nanoplastics from ground polyethylene terephthalate food containers: Genotoxicity in human lung epithelial A549 cells
This study tested nanoplastics made from ground-up PET food containers on human lung cells in the lab and found they caused DNA damage and increased harmful reactive oxygen species. Unlike most studies that use standard polystyrene particles, this research used real-world PET plastic from supermarket containers, making the results more relevant to actual human exposure. The findings suggest that inhaling tiny PET particles shed from everyday food packaging could pose a risk to lung health.
Pulmonary toxicology assessment of polyethylene terephthalate nanoplastic particles in vitro
Researchers evaluated the lung toxicity of polyethylene terephthalate nanoplastics on human lung cells and found that these particles entered cells but showed relatively low toxicity at environmental concentrations. At higher concentrations, the nanoplastics reduced cell survival and triggered significant oxidative stress. The study suggests that while routine exposure levels may pose limited immediate risk to lung cells, higher or accumulated exposures could cause oxidative damage worth monitoring.
A new source of representative secondary PET nanoplastics. Obtention, characterization, and hazard evaluation
Researchers developed a method to produce representative PET nanoplastics from water bottles using diamond burrs to avoid metal contamination. While the resulting nanoplastics were taken up by cells in laboratory tests, they did not induce significant cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, or DNA damage at the concentrations tested, though the authors note that more research with environmentally representative samples is needed.
Differences in toxicity induced by the various polymer types of nanoplastics on HepG2 cells
Researchers compared the toxicity of three common nanoplastic types on human liver cells and found that PET (used in bottles) and PVC were significantly more toxic than polystyrene, causing cell death through oxidative stress and a mitochondrial damage pathway. This is important because most toxicity studies have only tested polystyrene, potentially underestimating the health risks of the plastic types people actually encounter most in food and beverage packaging.