0
Article Sign in to save

Integrated TOPSIS-COV approach for selecting a sustainable PET waste management technology: A case study in Qatar

World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7 - 12, 2009, Munich, Germany 2022 17 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers applied a novel TOPSIS-COV multi-criteria decision-making framework to evaluate eight PET waste bottle treatment technologies across environmental, economic, and social factors, finding that closed-loop recycling ranked as the most sustainable option — a conclusion consistent with a separate expert-weighted AHP analysis.

Polymers

In 2018, the global annual consumption of Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles was approximately 27.64 million tons, with one million bottles sold worldwide every minute. Unmanaged PET bottles in the environment lead to a series of negative effects on the health of humans and ecosystems. Therefore, the objective of this research was to evaluate the sustainability of eight different PET waste bottle treatment methods using a holistic multi-criteria decision-making approach that combined the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) with analytic hierarchy (AHP; TOPSIS-AHP) and coefficient of variation (COV; TOPSIS-COV) approaches. To the best of our knowledge, TOPSIS-COV has not yet been used for waste management. The treatment methods were compared and analyzed against twelve different performance criteria representing three pillars of sustainability: environmental, economic, and social. Both approaches determined closed-loop recycling to be optimal for treating PET waste bottles. The weights of performance indicators obtained using the COV and AHP approaches were comparable, except for cost, photochemical oxidant potential, and human toxicity. The large dispersion in the values of the photochemical oxidant potential causes it to have a higher weight in the COV approach. For cost, the weight was higher using the AHP approach by approximately 12%, which reflects the preference of decision-makers to reduce costs of ventures.

More Papers Like This

Article

Decision Analysis Approaches on the Collection Methods of Polyethylene Terephthalate Waste

AI summary Read the abstract

This study applied multi-criteria decision analysis (AHP and TOPSIS) to rank PET plastic waste collection strategies, finding that a threshold-based plastic bottle collection method outperformed alternatives across cost, environmental impact, and feasibility criteria, with results validated by a secondary VIKOR analysis.

Article Tier 2

Decision Analysis Approaches on the Collection Methods of Polyethylene Terephthalate Waste

AI summary Read the abstract

This study compared three decision-analysis methods (AHP, TOPSIS, and VIKOR) to rank PET plastic bottle cap collection strategies and found that threshold-based collection (collecting caps only above a weight or volume threshold) is the most cost-effective and practical approach. Although this paper focuses on PET waste management strategy rather than microplastic contamination directly, improving PET collection efficiency is an important upstream step for reducing the plastic debris that ultimately fragments into microplastics in the environment.

Review

Multicriteria Decision Analysis Addressing Marine and Terrestrial Plastic Waste Management: A Review

AI summary Read the abstract

This systematic review analyzed 20 studies using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to evaluate plastic waste management strategies across three continents, finding that AHP was the most popular method and that multi-strategy combinations consistently outperformed single-approach solutions.

Article Tier 2

Assessing the Selection of PET Recycling Optionsin Japan: Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

AI summary Read the abstract

This study examines PET plastic recycling options in Japan using a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework, set against the global context in which only 9% of plastic waste is recycled and 22% bypasses proper waste management. The analysis evaluates competing recycling pathways to identify the most sustainable and economically viable approaches for managing Japan's PET waste streams.

Article Tier 2

Comparative Analysis of Environmental, Economic, and Social Criteria for Plastic Recycling Technology Selection in India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, and Thailand

AI summary Read the abstract

This study surveyed stakeholders in four Asian countries about criteria for selecting PET plastic recycling technologies, finding that environmental and economic factors were rated highest. Improving PET recycling capacity is critical for reducing plastic waste that ultimately becomes microplastic pollution.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper