We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Barriers to recycling plastics from the perspectives of industry stakeholders: a qualitative study
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted a qualitative study with industry stakeholders across the plastic value chain, identifying systemic barriers to plastic recycling — including economic disincentives, infrastructure gaps, and design-for-disposal norms — that consumer-focused research has largely overlooked.
Previous research exploring the psychological, social, and environmental barriers to recycling has predominantly focused on consumer attitude and behaviour. However, the plastic system involves a chain of stakeholders with a role in decision-making and actions in relation to plastic production and management post-use, affirming the need to explore the barriers to recycle across various other stakeholders implicated in the lifecycle of plastic product and packaging. To expand this evidence-base, N = 12 in-depth qualitative semi-structured interviews explored the perspectives of some of the stakeholders responsible for various aspects of the plastic life cycle (fast moving consumer goods industry, retailers, and waste management professionals). Using a semi-directed content analysis approach via NVivo, three overarching themes were extracted from the data: 1) Disempowerment and lost opportunities 2) Solutions and opportunities reside with use of legislation 3) The circular economy stakeholders need motivation, and to be more knowledgeable. The themes suggest that stakeholders implicated in the plastic lifecycle lack the drive and perceived personal and organizational efficacy to generate meaningful change in the plastic system. These barriers are exacerbated by a lack of collegial partnerships between stakeholders to facilitate knowledge transfer and collective action. This study recommends greater collaboration and communication between stakeholders implicated in the end-to-end plastic “chain”, and makes a renewed call for further legislation, having shed light on important socio-political and pragmatic barriers to reducing plastic waste.
More Papers Like This
Attitudes towards Plastic Pollution: A Review and Mitigations beyond Circular Economy
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examined attitudes of consumers, industries, and governments toward plastic pollution, identifying behavioral barriers and synthesizing mitigation strategies that go beyond circular economy frameworks to address systemic plastic over-consumption.
An Integrated Analysis of Plastic Packaging Value Chain: Identifying Barriers and Enablers for a Circular Economy
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed the full plastic packaging value chain to identify barriers and enablers for transitioning to a circular economy, tracing the evolution of circular economy concepts and quantifying the environmental impacts associated with exponential plastic waste growth. The study provides an integrated framework mapping opportunities for intervention across production, use, collection, and recycling stages.
Enhancing public participation in plastic waste management for a sustainable circular economy: insights from Indonesia
AI summary Read the abstract
This study surveyed 1,000 Indonesian residents about circular plastic waste management, finding that reducing plastic waste was the community's top priority, and that improving waste workers' quality of life and raising environmental awareness most strongly increased willingness to separate and reuse plastics.
Competing narratives inhibit a circular economy for bio‐based plastic packaging: Insights from a social innovation lab study in Brazil, Canada, Poland and the UK
AI summary Read the abstract
A social innovation lab study across Brazil, Canada, Poland, and the UK found that competing narratives and lack of end-of-life infrastructure are the primary barriers preventing bio-based compostable plastic packaging from achieving circular economy goals. Stakeholder interviews and workshops identified contamination in processing facilities, absent regulation, and greenwashing susceptibility as systemic obstacles requiring shared responsibility and simplified materials.
Transdisciplinary pragmatic melioration for the plastic life cycle: Why the social, natural, and technical sciences should prioritize reducing harm
AI summary Read the abstract
This review argues that solving the global plastic waste crisis requires a transdisciplinary approach integrating natural sciences, engineering, and social sciences focused on pragmatic harm reduction across the full plastic lifecycle, rather than siloed technical research that overlooks social contexts and systemic inequities in waste management.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.