We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Transdisciplinary pragmatic melioration for the plastic life cycle: Why the social, natural, and technical sciences should prioritize reducing harm
AI summary Read the abstract
This review argues that solving the global plastic waste crisis requires a transdisciplinary approach integrating natural sciences, engineering, and social sciences focused on pragmatic harm reduction across the full plastic lifecycle, rather than siloed technical research that overlooks social contexts and systemic inequities in waste management.
Plastics underpin modern society but also threaten to choke it. Only 9 % of all plastic waste is recycled, usually with loss of quality ("downcycling"); the rest is landfilled or dumped (79 %) or incinerated (12 %). Put bluntly, the "plastic age" needs a "sustainable plastic culture." Consequently, we urgently need to develop a global and transdisciplinary approach not only to fully recycle plastics but also to manage the harms across their life cycle. The past decade has witnessed an explosion in research on new technologies and interventions that purport to help solve the plastic waste challenge; however, this work has, in most cases, been carried forward within single disciplines (for example, researching novel chemical and bio-based technologies for plastic degradation, engineering processing equipment innovations, and mapping recycling behaviours). In particular, although there has been vast progress within individual scientific fields, such work does not address the complexities of various plastic types and waste management systems. Meanwhile, research on the social contexts (and constraints) of plastic use and disposal is rarely in conversation with the sciences to drive innovation. In short, research on plastics typically lacks a transdisciplinary perspective. In this review, we urge the adoption of a transdisciplinary approach that focuses on pragmatic melioration; such an approach combines the natural and technical sciences with the social sciences to focus on the mitigation of harms across the plastic life cycle. To illustrate our case, we review the status of plastic recycling from these three scientific perspectives. Based on this, we advocate 1) foundational studies to identify sources of harm and 2) global/local interventions aimed at those plastics and aspects of the plastic life cycle that cause maximal harm, both in terms of planetary welfare and social justice. We believe this approach to plastic stewardship can be a showcase for tackling other environmental challenges.
More Papers Like This
Plastic pollution research is lacking discussions on research philosophy: Inspiration from Critical Physical Geography to bridge the gap
AI summary Read the abstract
This commentary argues that plastic pollution research lacks philosophical reflection on epistemology and disciplinary assumptions, creating a divide between physical and social sciences that limits genuine interdisciplinarity. The author proposes using Critical Physical Geography as a bridge to foster more integrated, socially aware research on plastic pollution.
A transdisciplinary approach to reducing global plastic pollution
AI summary Read the abstract
This opinion piece advocates for a transdisciplinary approach to reducing global plastic pollution, emphasizing the need to integrate natural science, social science, governance, and industry perspectives to develop effective and equitable solutions to the plastic pollution crisis.
A multidisciplinary perspective on the role of plastic pollution in the triple planetary crisis.
AI summary Read the abstract
This perspective paper argues that plastics are a central driver of all three dimensions of the planetary crisis — pollution, climate change, and biodiversity loss — and must be addressed with the same urgency as carbon emissions. The authors call for a multidisciplinary approach that recognizes plastics as a systemic environmental threat rather than a siloed waste management issue.
Societal Awareness, Regulatory Framework, and Technical Guidelines for Management of Plastic Wastes
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines the social and governance dimensions of plastic waste management, arguing that sustainable outcomes require integrating sociological perspectives — including public awareness, institutional frameworks, and regulatory standards — alongside technical approaches to reduce global plastic pollution.
Next steps for research on society and microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
This perspective paper outlined priority directions for social and behavioral science research on microplastics, building on the established contributions of social sciences to understanding policy, stakeholder views, and public behavior around plastic pollution. The authors called for greater integration of social science methods to address governance gaps and support effective microplastic management.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.