0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Microplastics in Small Ruminants II

2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Iván González-Puetate, Carmen Marín-Tello, J. López, Katherine Alejandra Moya Palacios

Summary

Researchers examined 100 fecal samples from goats in Manabí Province, Ecuador, finding microplastic contamination in all samples and identifying the specific plastic types using two laboratory processing methods.

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the presence of microplastics in goats in one of the cantons, in the province of Manabí, Ecuador; the unit of analysis was goat feces (Capra aegagrus hircus), the type of research used was field, non-experimental, observational, transversal, descriptive and analytical. In this study, 100 fecal samples were collected for the purpose of processing them in the laboratory of the Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia This was done using two types of techniques. The procedure to follow was to leave them in the incubator for 4 hours at a temperature of 37.5 °C with the help of a glass pipette, a drop of the sample was taken and placed on the slide and then covered with a glass plate coverslip and finally observe it under a microscope with a 10x objective. Obtaining as a result a prevalence of 93% with the supersaturated saline solution and 100% of potassium hydroxide solution to a 10% in the presence of microplastics in the analyzed samples. Regarding the sex variable, statistical significance was found in females corresponding to a free grazing system. It is important to keep in mind in future research the toxicity and its impact on the health that may affect goats.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in Small Ruminants I

A study in Guayas Province, Ecuador, found microplastics in every sample collected from 200 sheep feces, water, and feed samples, with water origin and feed category as the primary sources of microplastic contamination in small ruminant farming.

Article Tier 2

Emerging contaminants in rural water: microplastic pollution and its association with agricultural, livestock, and industrial activities in Ecuador

Researchers surveyed 169 samples from 29 rural drinking water systems in southern Ecuador, finding microplastics in 61.5% of samples, with PET as the most frequent polymer and contamination levels correlating with proximity to agricultural, livestock, and industrial activities.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic Contamination in Pig Production

Researchers analyzed 200 samples—feces, water, and feed—from pig farming operations in Manta, Ecuador, finding microplastics in 100% of samples, with water source and feed category identified as key contamination sources.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic Contamination in Horse Husbandry

Researchers assessed microplastic contamination in water sources, feed types, and equine feces at two horse husbandry facilities in Guayas province, Ecuador, finding microplastics detectable in all sample types. Results showed 58 percent of river water samples and 66 percent of balanced feed samples contained microplastics, demonstrating that horses are exposed to plastic particles through multiple pathways in both their water supply and diet.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in Brazilian milk: isolation and characterization

Brazilian researchers isolated and characterized microplastics from commercial milk samples, finding particles in all tested products across multiple polymer types, and raising concerns about microplastic contamination of dairy products through packaging and processing environments.

Share this paper