0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Microplastics in Small Ruminants II

2025

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers examined 100 fecal samples from goats in Manabí Province, Ecuador, finding microplastic contamination in all samples and identifying the specific plastic types using two laboratory processing methods.

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the presence of microplastics in goats in one of the cantons, in the province of Manabí, Ecuador; the unit of analysis was goat feces (Capra aegagrus hircus), the type of research used was field, non-experimental, observational, transversal, descriptive and analytical. In this study, 100 fecal samples were collected for the purpose of processing them in the laboratory of the Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia This was done using two types of techniques. The procedure to follow was to leave them in the incubator for 4 hours at a temperature of 37.5 °C with the help of a glass pipette, a drop of the sample was taken and placed on the slide and then covered with a glass plate coverslip and finally observe it under a microscope with a 10x objective. Obtaining as a result a prevalence of 93% with the supersaturated saline solution and 100% of potassium hydroxide solution to a 10% in the presence of microplastics in the analyzed samples. Regarding the sex variable, statistical significance was found in females corresponding to a free grazing system. It is important to keep in mind in future research the toxicity and its impact on the health that may affect goats.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in Small Ruminants I

AI summary Read the abstract

A study in Guayas Province, Ecuador, found microplastics in every sample collected from 200 sheep feces, water, and feed samples, with water origin and feed category as the primary sources of microplastic contamination in small ruminant farming.

Article Tier 2

Presence of microplastics in small ruminants from pastoral systems on the Ecuadorian coast

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers testing goats and sheep in coastal Ecuador found tiny plastic particles (microplastics) in every single animal they checked — mostly plastic fibers, likely from farm materials like textile waste or degrading plastic tarps. This matters because these are farm animals raised for meat and milk, so if microplastics are building up in their bodies, they could potentially be making their way into the food we eat too — though more research is needed to confirm exactly what these particles are and how they might affect us.

Article Tier 2

Emerging contaminants in rural water: microplastic pollution and its association with agricultural, livestock, and industrial activities in Ecuador

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers surveyed 169 samples from 29 rural drinking water systems in southern Ecuador, finding microplastics in 61.5% of samples, with PET as the most frequent polymer and contamination levels correlating with proximity to agricultural, livestock, and industrial activities.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic Contamination in Pig Production

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers analyzed 200 samples—feces, water, and feed—from pig farming operations in Manta, Ecuador, finding microplastics in 100% of samples, with water source and feed category identified as key contamination sources.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in Cattle and Dog Feces from Kathmandu Valley, Nepal

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers examined feces from cattle and dogs in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal, finding microplastics in 99% of samples. Stray cattle and free-roaming dogs had higher microplastic levels than animals kept in confined settings, and particle shapes differed by species. Testing identified plastics including polyethylene, polypropylene, PET and polystyrene.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper