0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Oppositely charged proteins lead to different effects on the bioaccumulation kinetics of polystyrene nanoplastics in zebrafish (Danio rerio)

Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2025 1 citation

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers studied how positively and negatively charged proteins in water affect the bioaccumulation of polystyrene nanoplastics in zebrafish. The study found that different protein types altered nanoplastic uptake kinetics in distinct ways, suggesting that the natural protein environment in water bodies plays an important role in determining how nanoplastics accumulate in aquatic organisms.

Polymers
Study Type In vivo

Nanoplastics (NPs) are ubiquitous in the natural aquatic environment, thus there is a major need to understand their potential health risk toward aquatic organisms. Proteins are widely spread in the water environment, they may interact with NPs and significantly impact the ecotoxicology of NPs in vivo. In this study, positively charged lysozyme (LYZ) and negatively charged ovalbumin (OVA) were selected as model proteins, and their effects on the bioaccumulation kinetics of polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-NPs) in zebrafish were investigated quantitatively using a biokinetic model. The adsorption of OVA decreased the uptake rates of PS-NPs, thereby reducing the bioconcentration factors (BCF) of PS-NPs in zebrafish. However, in the presence of LYZ, the uptake rates of PS-NPs increased while the depuration rates decreased significantly, as a consequence, the BCF of PS-NPs in zebrafish were elevated. Dynamic light scattering, transmission electron microscopy, and confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis demonstrated that the adsorption of OVA significantly increased the negative charge and hydrodynamic size of PS-NPs, inhibited the interaction between the nanoparticles and negatively charged cell membrane, thus leading to the alleviated bioaccumulation. In contrast, LYZ changed the surface charge of PS-NPs to positive, enhanced the electrostatic attraction and interaction between PS-NPs and cell membrane, thereby increasing the bioavailability of PS-NPs. Our results highlight the impacts of proteins on the biokinetics of NPs, providing novel insights into the ecological risk of nanoplastics.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Charge-specific adverse effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on zebrafish (Danio rerio) development and behavior

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed developing zebrafish to positively and negatively charged nanoplastics and found that the positively charged particles were significantly more toxic, accumulating in the brain and gut and causing developmental delays and brain cell death. The two types of nanoplastics affected different neurotransmitter pathways and interacted with different brain receptors, explaining their distinct behavioral effects. The study demonstrates that the surface charge of nanoplastics plays a critical role in determining their toxicity to developing organisms.

Article Tier 2

Influence of nanoplastic surface charge on eco-corona formation, aggregation and toxicity to freshwater zooplankton

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers examined how surface charge and natural organic matter influence the stability and toxicity of polystyrene nanoplastics to freshwater zooplankton. They found that positively charged nanoplastics were significantly more toxic than negatively charged ones, and that natural organic matter formed an eco-corona on the particles that reduced their toxicity. The study highlights that both particle surface properties and environmental conditions play critical roles in determining nanoplastic impacts on aquatic organisms.

Article Tier 2

Towards a better understanding of protein affinity for polystyrene nanoplastics: Investigation of surface charge effects, interaction mechanisms and aggregation kinetics

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists found that tiny plastic particles (nanoplastics) interact very differently with proteins in our blood depending on their electrical charge: positively charged particles bind proteins and clump together, while negatively charged ones stay separate. This matters because how these plastic particles behave in our body, whether they clump or spread out, could affect how they travel through blood and tissues, an important step in understanding their health risks.

Article Tier 2

Effects of size and surface charge on the sedimentation of nanoplastics in freshwater

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated how size and surface charge of polystyrene nanoplastics affect their sedimentation behavior in freshwater, finding that both properties significantly influence aggregation dynamics and settling rates, with implications for predicting nanoplastic fate in aquatic environments.

Article Tier 2

Influence of protein configuration on aggregation kinetics of nanoplastics in aquatic environment

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated how five different proteins with varying structures affect the aggregation behavior of polystyrene nanoplastics in water under different ionic strength and pH conditions. They found that protein type and configuration significantly influenced whether nanoplastics clumped together or remained dispersed, with globular proteins like albumin having different effects than fibrous proteins like collagen. The study suggests that the protein composition of natural waters plays an important role in determining how nanoplastics behave and transport in aquatic environments.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper