We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
“The human face of the UN plastics treaty”? The role of waste pickers in intergovernmental negotiations to end plastic pollution and ensure a just transition
AI summary Read the abstract
This article examines how the International Alliance of Waste Pickers gained recognition in UN plastics treaty negotiations through naming practices, performative advocacy, and multi-scale alliance building. The findings highlight waste pickers—who recover up to 60% of recycled plastic globally—as critical stakeholders in achieving a just transition away from plastic pollution.
Abstract Waste pickers are recognised as a key stakeholder in the ongoing negotiations towards an international legally binding instrument to end plastic pollution. Up to 34 million waste pickers contribute to recovering close to 60% of recycled post-consumer plastic waste globally. The International Alliance of Waste Pickers (IAWP) has actively engaged in the negotiations to safeguard a just transition for these important but vulnerable and frequently overlooked workers. This article explores how the IAWP has gained prominence in the plastics treaty negotiations through three iterative processes. First, the reiterative naming of “waste pickers” has constituted a symbolic practice and discursive influence that heightened recognition of waste pickers’ role as knowledge and rights holders in a just transition to end plastic pollution. Second, the performative dimension of waste picker advocacy has influenced official and informal events. Third, by engaging in “scale work”, waste pickers have influenced and leveraged their alliances to work towards a just transition across national, regional and international levels. By examining the role and influence of waste pickers in the plastics treaty through the frames of naming, performance and scale, the article contributes to advance the scholarly literature on just transition and grassroots movements in global environmental governance (GEG).
More Papers Like This
Underrepresented developing States, marginalized communities, big business and procedural injustice – how equal were the UN INC-5.2 Global Plastic Treaty negotiations?
AI summary Read the abstract
This analysis of the UN INC-5.2 global plastic treaty negotiations found that developing state delegations averaged only half the size of Western European delegations, while over 230 industry representatives exerted influence through official and side event participation. The authors argue that simultaneously occurring negotiation formats disadvantaged smaller delegations, creating procedural injustice that falls under the responsibility of the INC Secretariat.
Event Ethnography to study the global negotiations on the treaty to end plastic pollution: dataset from the first session of negotiations (INC-1)
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used event ethnography to study the global negotiations toward a legally binding international plastics treaty, observing negotiation sessions and documenting how different stakeholder groups — governments, industry, and civil society — framed their positions. The study reveals how contested definitions of plastic pollution and responsibility shaped negotiating dynamics.
Lessons Translated: Civil Society Organizations as Knowledge Brokers in Global Plastic Treaty Negotiations
AI summary Read the abstract
This study examined how civil society organizations (CSOs) functioned as knowledge brokers during the UNDP's Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) process for a global plastics treaty, which concluded without consensus after six rounds of negotiations from 2022 to 2025. CSOs translated complex treaty language, reframed plastics as issues of justice and human rights through side-events and digital activism, with digital technologies amplifying their brokerage role by bridging global governance with community mobilization.
Taming plastic pollution—a systematic mapping of the literature on plastic policies between 2009 and 2024
AI summary Read the abstract
This systematic review mapped 15 years of academic literature on plastic pollution policy and politics, finding that research has focused heavily on policy inventories, impact assessments, and global governance architecture, while systematic evaluations of policy effectiveness and actor-level political analyses remain scarce. The authors argue that future research must shift toward understanding the politics of compliance and country-level performance to inform the effectiveness of an emerging multilateral plastics agreement.
Desafios e perspectivas no enfrentamento da poluição marinha por plástico sob a ótica das negociações do acordo global juridicamente vinculante
AI summary Read the abstract
This research examined the prospects for tackling marine plastic pollution through negotiations on a globally legally binding plastic agreement under UNEP auspices. The study concluded that while the treaty represents a significant advance over existing fragmented frameworks, significant challenges remain due to contradictory options in the draft text and difficulties reaching global consensus on binding provisions.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.