We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Underrepresented developing States, marginalized communities, big business and procedural injustice – how equal were the UN INC-5.2 Global Plastic Treaty negotiations?
AI summary Read the abstract
This analysis of the UN INC-5.2 global plastic treaty negotiations found that developing state delegations averaged only half the size of Western European delegations, while over 230 industry representatives exerted influence through official and side event participation. The authors argue that simultaneously occurring negotiation formats disadvantaged smaller delegations, creating procedural injustice that falls under the responsibility of the INC Secretariat.
Abstract Negotiations by more than 180 States during the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) session 5.2 to develop a legally binding instrument with the purpose to end plastic pollution have, once again, concluded without a treaty. This is especially disastrous for developing States and marginalized peoples (such as indigenous communities and waste pickers), who are disproportionately suffering from plastic pollution. In this article, we show that developing States were underrepresented at the INC-5.2 negotiations in Geneva: Their delegations were on average only half as large (~5 delegates) when compared to delegations from Western European States (~13 delegates) and those from States with a high and very high Human Development Index (~10 delegates). In addition, more than 230 industry representatives participated in INC-5.2, exerting influence in diverse ways, both during official negotiations and through side events, organized by lobbying organizations. Finally, we discuss the importance of how treaty negotiations were organized: Simultaneously occurring negotiation formats (such as contact groups and informal meetings) put smaller delegations at a disadvantage, causing procedural injustice, which falls under the responsibility of the INC Secretariat.
More Papers Like This
Deadlock at INC-5.2: Understanding the blocked progress of the Global Plastics Treaty negotiations
AI summary Read the abstract
The Global Plastics Treaty negotiations at INC-5.2 in 2025 collapsed due to a fundamental split between nations favoring upstream plastic production caps and oil-producing states limiting discussion to downstream waste management. This governance failure has profound implications for microplastic pollution, as without production limits, plastic fragmentation into the environment will continue accelerating.
Five’s a crowd: divergence and delay at the first half of the fifth global plastics treaty negotiation (INC-5.1)
AI summary Read the abstract
Participant observation and document analysis of the UN INC-5.1 global plastics treaty negotiations in Busan (2024) revealed that fundamental disagreements between waste-management-focused nations and those advocating full lifecycle production limits prevented consensus, extending negotiations beyond 2026. The impasse underscores how divergent national interests continue to stall binding international action on plastic pollution at its source.
Against the clock to address plastic pollution: Critical challenges to elaborate a comprehensive and ambitious Plastic Treaty
AI summary Read the abstract
This analysis of the ongoing UN Plastics Treaty negotiations identifies ten critical unresolved issues—including scope, equity, financing, and binding commitments—that could compromise the treaty's environmental ambitions. The authors warn that domestic interests and international power disparities may weaken the final instrument, calling for greater international cooperation to prioritize global environmental integrity.
The Failure of the Global Plastics Treaty Conference and Its Implications for Developing Countries
AI summary Read the abstract
This study analyses the factors behind the failure of the Global Plastics Treaty negotiations in 2024-2025, examining conflicts between developed and developing countries, the plastics industry, and civil society over commitments to reduce plastic production and pollution. The authors argue that the treaty failure disproportionately harms developing countries that lack regulatory capacity to unilaterally address plastic and microplastic pollution entering their environments.
Event Ethnography to study the global negotiations on the treaty to end plastic pollution: dataset from the first session of negotiations (INC-1)
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used event ethnography to study the global negotiations toward a legally binding international plastics treaty, observing negotiation sessions and documenting how different stakeholder groups — governments, industry, and civil society — framed their positions. The study reveals how contested definitions of plastic pollution and responsibility shaped negotiating dynamics.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.