0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

A comparative analysis of microplastics in feces of terrestrial mammalian wildlife around Hong Kong

Scientific Reports 2025 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 58 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Mariella Siña, Mariella Siña, Alexander Kunz, Christelle Not Alexander Kunz, Mariella Siña, Mariella Siña, Christelle Not Alexander Kunz, Alexander Kunz, Alexander Kunz, Christelle Not Christelle Not Christelle Not Christelle Not Christelle Not Christelle Not Christelle Not Christelle Not Christelle Not Christelle Not Alexander Kunz, Alexander Kunz, Alexander Kunz, Alexander Kunz, Christelle Not Christelle Not Alexander Kunz, Alexander Kunz, Christelle Not Christelle Not Alexander Kunz, Christelle Not Christelle Not Alexander Kunz, Christelle Not Christelle Not Christelle Not Christelle Not Sofia Ya Hsuan Liou, Alexander Kunz, Sofia Ya Hsuan Liou, Christelle Not Sofia Ya Hsuan Liou, Sofia Ya Hsuan Liou, Christelle Not Sofia Ya Hsuan Liou, Christelle Not Christelle Not Mariella Siña, Christelle Not Christelle Not Alexander Kunz, Mariella Siña, Christelle Not

Summary

Researchers compared microplastic contamination in the feces of five wild mammal species living near urban areas in Hong Kong, including buffalo, wild boar, and macaques. They found microplastics in all species and at all sites, with buffalo showing the highest concentrations and macaques showing the widest range of contamination levels. The study suggests that wildlife living near human settlements faces significant microplastic exposure through food and environmental contact.

Polymers

Plastic ingestion by terrestrial mammals, especially wildlife near urbanized areas, remains underexplored, with limited studies exploring species-specific differences. This study addresses these gaps by examining microplastics (MPs) in feces of five wild species from Hong Kong's countryside: buffalo, cattle, wild boar, macaques, and porcupines. These species were selected for their high interaction with humans and consumption of anthropogenic food. Fecal samples were digested, visually inspected, and MPs characterized using spectroscopy. Microplastics were detected across all sites: macaques (0.2-6.9 MPs/gram dry weight [d.w.], 50-90% occurrence), boars (0.5-3.7 MPs/gram d.w., 60-100% occurrence), porcupines (2.1 MPs/gram d.w., 80% occurrence), buffalo (17.7 MPs/gram d.w., 100% occurrence), and cattle (4.1-65.5 MPs/gram d.w., 90-100% occurrence). Secondary microplastics, primarily polyethylene, polypropylene, and polyester (common in food packaging and textiles) were predominant. Feeding behaviour significantly influenced microplastic abundance. Non-selective grazers (buffalo and cattle) exhibited higher concentrations (median: 15.8 and 17.7 MPs/gram d.w., respectively) compared to selective feeders (macaques, porcupines, and boars; median: 1.8, 2.1, and 1.2 MPs/gram d.w.). Regarding MPs size, the larger mammals, cattle and buffalo, excreted significantly larger microplastics (522 and 391 µm) compared to macaques and porcupines (301 and 268 µm). We present the first evidence of plastic ingestion by common wildlife species from Hong Kong, emphasizing the vulnerability of animals to plastic pollution in peri-urban habitats. The findings underscore the need for research on the health impacts of plastic ingestion and the development of strategies to mitigate plastic pollution to natural ecosystems.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper