We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
A comparative analysis of microplastics in feces of terrestrial mammalian wildlife around Hong Kong
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared microplastic contamination in the feces of five wild mammal species living near urban areas in Hong Kong, including buffalo, wild boar, and macaques. They found microplastics in all species and at all sites, with buffalo showing the highest concentrations and macaques showing the widest range of contamination levels. The study suggests that wildlife living near human settlements faces significant microplastic exposure through food and environmental contact.
Plastic ingestion by terrestrial mammals, especially wildlife near urbanized areas, remains underexplored, with limited studies exploring species-specific differences. This study addresses these gaps by examining microplastics (MPs) in feces of five wild species from Hong Kong's countryside: buffalo, cattle, wild boar, macaques, and porcupines. These species were selected for their high interaction with humans and consumption of anthropogenic food. Fecal samples were digested, visually inspected, and MPs characterized using spectroscopy. Microplastics were detected across all sites: macaques (0.2-6.9 MPs/gram dry weight [d.w.], 50-90% occurrence), boars (0.5-3.7 MPs/gram d.w., 60-100% occurrence), porcupines (2.1 MPs/gram d.w., 80% occurrence), buffalo (17.7 MPs/gram d.w., 100% occurrence), and cattle (4.1-65.5 MPs/gram d.w., 90-100% occurrence). Secondary microplastics, primarily polyethylene, polypropylene, and polyester (common in food packaging and textiles) were predominant. Feeding behaviour significantly influenced microplastic abundance. Non-selective grazers (buffalo and cattle) exhibited higher concentrations (median: 15.8 and 17.7 MPs/gram d.w., respectively) compared to selective feeders (macaques, porcupines, and boars; median: 1.8, 2.1, and 1.2 MPs/gram d.w.). Regarding MPs size, the larger mammals, cattle and buffalo, excreted significantly larger microplastics (522 and 391 µm) compared to macaques and porcupines (301 and 268 µm). We present the first evidence of plastic ingestion by common wildlife species from Hong Kong, emphasizing the vulnerability of animals to plastic pollution in peri-urban habitats. The findings underscore the need for research on the health impacts of plastic ingestion and the development of strategies to mitigate plastic pollution to natural ecosystems.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics in fecal samples of mammalian terrestrial wildlife in Hong Kong
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers assessed microplastic presence and abundance in fecal samples from mammalian wildlife in Hong Kong country parks, examining how animals living near human-modified habitats accumulate plastic particles. Microplastics were detected in wildlife feces, with types reflecting human-associated plastic waste from nearby populated areas.
Microplastics in fecal samples of mammalian terrestrial wildlife in Hong Kong
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed fecal samples from seven mammalian wildlife species in Hong Kong country parks to assess microplastic ingestion. All species tested positive for microplastics, with fiber morphotypes dominating, suggesting that urban wildlife is routinely ingesting plastic particles.
Using feces to indicate plastic pollution in terrestrial vertebrate species in western Thailand
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers examined feces from 12 wild animal species in western Thailand and found microplastics in over 40% of samples across eight species, including elephants, deer, and wild boar. The amount of microplastics found was linked to human activity near the animals' habitats. This demonstrates that microplastic contamination has reached even terrestrial wildlife in protected areas, entering the food chain far from obvious pollution sources.
First Report of Microplastics in Wild Long-Tailed Macaque (Macaca fascicularis) Feces at Kosumpee Forest Park, Maha Sarakham, Thailand
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers report the first detection of microplastics in the feces of wild long-tailed macaques at a forest park in Thailand. They found various types and sizes of microplastic particles in the samples, indicating that these primates are ingesting plastics from their environment. The study raises concerns about the extent of microplastic contamination reaching wildlife in natural habitats through dietary exposure.
Microplastics contamination in terrestrial wildlife: the study in carcasses and feces of vertebrate species in western Thailand
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers examined microplastic accumulation in terrestrial wildlife carcasses and fecal samples from protected and non-protected areas of western Thailand, finding contamination in multiple species. The presence of microplastics in wildlife from protected areas highlights the inability of conservation boundaries to shield fauna from pervasive plastic pollution.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.