We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Life cycle assessment of recycling metallised food packaging plastics using mechanical, thermal and chemical processes
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers evaluated mechanical, thermal, and chemical recycling approaches for metallized food packaging plastics, finding that single-method treatment yields recycling rates below 20% due to the complex aluminum-plastic laminate structure, while combined approaches show more promise.
Single treatment of metallised food packaging plastics waste (MFPW) has shown disappointing results with recycling rate <20 % due to its complex structure consisting of 10 % aluminium (Al) and 90 % mixed plastic films made of PE, PP, PS, PET, etc. Besides, it is generating many emissions and residues that must be landfilled making it difficult to integrate them into the circular economy. Therefore, a multi-stage recycling (MSR) approach has recently been developed using several sequential mechanical, thermal and chemical processes to recover energy and Al from MFPW with additional revenue for recycling plant operators. The thermal treatment helps to decompose the plastic fraction into wax or oil, gaseous, and solid residue (SR) composed of Al and coal, while the mechanical process can be used as a pre-treatment of MFPW feedstock and SR. Finally, the chemical treatment (leaching and functionalization) can be used to extract Al from SR and to refine coal into carbon microparticles (CPs), respectively. In order to investigate the environmental performance of the proposed MSR system, this research was developed. The investigation was performed using SimaPro life cycle analysis (LCA) tool according to ISO 14040/44 Standards and the impact assessment method is ReCiPe 2016. Five different scenarios were proposed in the constructed LCA layout, namely, conversion of MFPW to a) wax and gas (pyrolysis), b) wax, gas, and aluminium chloride (AlCl₃) (pyrolysis and leaching), c) wax, gas, AlCl₃, and CPs (pyrolysis, leaching, and functionalization), and d) oil, gas, AlCl₃, and CPs (catalytic pyrolysis, leaching, and functionalization). Besides, the oil produced from catalytic pyrolysis is used for generation of electricity (scenario e). The results showed that wax and gas recovery scenario (a) has better environmental potential and environmental benefits compared to incineration practice. The results did not change much after extraction of Al and CPs (scenario b, c), with a few increasing by 2-4% in the total score. While a lot of environmental burdens from upgrading and utilization (Scenario d, e) were recorded, reaching 79 % due to the huge amount of the catalyst was used. Thus, MSR systems have bigger environmental benefits, however, the chemical and catalytic processes still need to be further improved to reduce the effect of terrestrial acidification.
More Papers Like This
Life cycle assessment of reduce, recycling and final treatment of plastic primary food packaging in Norway using a system expansion with multiple functions scope
AI summary Read the abstract
This life cycle assessment of plastic food packaging in Norway found that current recycling rates offer no significant environmental benefit over linear systems with energy recovery, while a 50% reduction in material thickness universally cut environmental impact by 50% across all categories — highlighting material reduction as a more effective strategy than recycling alone.
Valorisation of polylactic acid (PLA) waste: A comparative life cycle assessment of various solvent-based chemical recycling technologies
AI summary Read the abstract
"Researchers performed a life cycle assessment comparing three chemical recycling routes — hydrolysis, methanol-based alcoholysis, and ethanol-based alcoholysis — for post-consumer PLA plastic waste, finding all three outperform direct incineration across most environmental impact categories. Alcoholysis methods showed the greatest benefits for global warming and acidification, while hydrolysis was superior for reducing land use and water scarcity."
Exploring the potential of chemical recycling using a distributed model in the UK – A life cycle assessment perspective
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted a life cycle assessment of small-scale, decentralized pyrolysis plants converting mixed plastic waste into naphtha in the UK, finding that chemical recycling reduces climate change impacts by up to 2,977 kg CO2-equivalent per tonne compared to virgin plastic production. While promising as a complement to mechanical recycling for complex waste streams, the study notes ongoing challenges with by-product environmental impacts and the need for policy support.
Chemical Recycling of Plastic Waste: Comparative Evaluation of Environmental and Economic Performances of Gasification- and Incineration-based Treatment for Lightweight Packaging Waste
AI summary Read the abstract
Chemical recycling of lightweight plastic packaging waste via gasification was compared to incineration with energy recovery using life cycle assessment and economic analysis, finding that gasification offered some environmental advantages but at higher cost and with significant technology readiness uncertainties. The study provides a comparative evaluation to inform decisions about complementary roles for chemical and mechanical recycling in plastic waste management.
How does plastic compare with alternative materials in the packaging sector? A systematic review of LCA studies
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers systematically reviewed 53 life cycle assessment studies comparing plastic packaging to alternatives like glass, paper, and metal, finding that conventional plastics frequently have lower overall environmental impact than perceived-sustainable substitutes when full production and transport emissions are accounted for.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.