0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Sign in to save

Biodegradable plastics – Where to throw? A life cycle assessment of waste collection and management pathways in Austria

Pharmaceuticals 2024 4 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Namrata Mhaddolkar, Concetta Lodato, Alexia Tischberger-Aldrian, Daniel Vollprecht, Thomas Fruergaard Astrup

Summary

Researchers used life cycle assessment to evaluate different waste collection and management pathways for biodegradable plastics in Austria, finding that consumer confusion about sorting — whether to place them in organic, plastic, or residual waste bins — leads to suboptimal environmental outcomes and that dedicated collection infrastructure is needed to realize their sustainability benefits.

Polymers
Body Systems

The current waste management systems are struggling to optimally handle biodegradable plastics (BDPs) and are facing numerous challenges; one of which is the consumer confusion about how to best source-segregate BDPs. Based on an environmental life-cycle assessment, this study investigated the consequences of collecting BDPs in one of three waste streams (packaging waste, biowaste, and residual waste) in Austria. Collecting BDPs as (i) packaging waste resulted in incineration (SP1) or mechanical recycling (SP2), (ii) biowaste resulted in composting (SB1) or anaerobic digestion (AD) (SB2), and (iii) residual waste in incineration (SR1). SP2 performed best in most of the 16 investigated impact categories (ICs). Three scenario analyses demonstrated that (i) utilisation of BDPs as an alternative fuel for process heat substitution yielded more environmental benefits than incineration in SP1 and SP2, (ii) adding a material recovery facility (MRF) with AD increased the environmental load for SB2, while (iii) the energy scenario with zero electricity imports plus heat from biomass performed best for most alternative pathways across the 16 ICs. Eight technology parameters (out of 97) were identified as most relevant for the results based on data quality, sensitivity ratio, and analytical uncertainty; they were related to waste incineration, MRF, recycling facility, compost- and AD processes. Overall, mechanical recycling emerged as the most favourable option which is aligned with the waste-hierarchy mentioned in the European Union Waste Framework Directive. However, effective mechanical recycling of BDPs requires (i) a 'sufficient' waste amount, (ii) a market for recyclates, and (iii) relevant mechanical recycling infrastructure.

Share this paper