We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Corporate engagement in mitigating plastic pollution: examining voluntary initiatives and EU regulations
AI summary Read the abstract
This article analyzes the EU regulatory framework on plastic pollution alongside voluntary corporate self-regulatory initiatives such as CSR programs and plastic credits, evaluating their effectiveness and identifying concerns about greenwashing and transparency. The authors conclude that while voluntary initiatives have a transitional role, the most effective long-term strategy requires reducing plastic production itself, supported by stringent and binding regulation.
Plastic pollution has emerged as a critical global environmental challenge, with far-reaching ecological, economic, and social implications. This article addresses the fragmented nature of the current literature on plastic pollution regulations and their impact on the corporate sector and aims to bridge this gap by providing a comprehensive analysis of the current EU regulatory framework and corporate voluntary self-regulatory initiatives relevant to plastic pollution. Examining voluntary initiatives – including corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs and the emerging concept of plastic credits – in terms of their potential to tackle plastic pollution and promote environmental sustainability, the article presents novel insights on how different regulatory mechanisms and voluntary self-regulatory initiatives engage the corporate sector in mitigating plastic pollution. While highlighting the importance of collaborative efforts between regulatory bodies and businesses, the study critically evaluates the challenges and limitations of current approaches. It addresses concerns about the efficacy and transparency of CSR initiatives, with particular attention to the issue of greenwashing and its potential legal implications. By synthesizing diverse sources, this article emphasizes the need to combine stringent regulatory frameworks with responsible business practices to engage the corporate sector in preventing and mitigating plastic pollution, specifically within the context of the European Union’s pioneering environmental policy. Ultimately, the study suggests that the most effective long-term solution lies in reducing plastic production altogether while acknowledging the role of transitional measures in the interim.
More Papers Like This
Reconceptualizing Plastic Pollution Regulation in Nigeria, the U.S., and the U.K. from a Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Perspective [Article]
AI summary Read the abstract
This article reconceptualizes plastic pollution regulation in Nigeria, the United States, and the United Kingdom through a Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) framework. The analysis examines how CSR principles can be applied to advance corporate accountability for plastic pollution across different regulatory contexts.
A Review of Existing Plastic Waste Management Strategies, Assessment & Tools: Towards the Development of a Plastic Offsetting Strategies
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers critically examine global plastic waste management strategies — including circular economy approaches, bioplastics, and the 3Rs framework — finding that only 9–10% of plastic is effectively recycled, and propose plastic offsetting inspired by carbon credit mechanisms as a financial instrument to direct resources toward waste management in underserved regions.
Consumer Responsibility for Sustainable Practices: Battling Plastic Pollution
AI summary Read the abstract
This research investigated the concentration and polymer composition of microplastics in atmospheric deposition in a remote forest area. Microplastics were deposited at measurable rates even in this undisturbed forest environment, with the composition dominated by fibers consistent with synthetic textile origin, confirming long-range atmospheric transport of microplastics.
Environmental Management Systems and Microplastic Pollution: Bridging Science, Policy, and Practice
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examined how environmental management systems can be applied to address microplastic pollution, bridging the gap between scientific research, corporate practice, and regulatory policy. The authors found that voluntary management frameworks and ISO-aligned approaches offer practical pathways for industry to reduce microplastic emissions, though mandatory regulatory standards are ultimately needed for systemic change.
Corporate responsibility to curb microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
This study investigated the psychosocial factors that influence corporate willingness to take responsibility for reducing microplastic emissions, drawing on behavioral science to understand why companies act — or fail to act — on plastic pollution. Key factors identified included perceived social norms, corporate identity, and regulatory pressure. The study suggests that combining public pressure, industry benchmarking, and regulatory frameworks could be effective in motivating corporate behavior change around microplastic pollution.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.