We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Evaluation of Length and Fiber Count Determinations for Natural and Synthetic Microfibers Using the OpTest Fiber Quality Analyzer
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers evaluated a Fiber Quality Analyzer for measuring microfiber counts and lengths across natural and synthetic textiles, finding strong detection rates for natural fibers like cotton and viscose but poor detection for synthetic microfibers — with polyester detected at only 14% — highlighting significant limitations for cross-material comparisons.
Microfibers are small fiber particles that range from 1 µm to 5 mm in length, generated through the home laundering and daily wear of textile garments. Microfibers stemming from synthetic textiles are a global pollution problem marked by their slow biodegradation and steady environmental accumulation. Thus, the quantification and study of factors controlling their generation is of interest. The aim of the current study included exploring the use of a Fiber Quality Analyzer-360 (FQA) for examining fiber counts and lengths of microfibers derived from cotton, flax, ramie, hemp, acrylic, polyester, viscose, and polyamide, and to explore if additional preparation steps, such as sonication, would improve microfiber detection by the system. While probe sonication led to higher fiber counts for most microfiber types, average microfiber lengths were statistically similar for most samples, with only the hemp and ramie samples showing statistically shorter microfibers following sonication. FQA detection estimates for cotton, viscose, and ramie microfibers were high, at 99, 101, and 116% for viscose, flax, and cotton, respectively. In contrast, synthetic microfibers of acrylic, polyamide and polyester showed 77, 43, and 14% detection rates, respectively. The high detection rate for the cotton sample is partly due to the higher fineness value obtained from the gravimetric determination. A similar calculation using AFIS fineness showed 86% detection. These observations confirm the significance of properly suspending the samples to accurately quantify microfibers while using the FQA system. Furthermore, the reduced detection of the examined synthetic microfibers suggests the limitations of the FQA as a technique for the direct comparison of natural and synthetic microfiber counts.
More Papers Like This
Evaluation of the OpTest Fiber Quality Analyzer for Quantifying Cotton and Rayon Microfibers
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers evaluated an automated imaging system (FQA-360) for counting textile microfibers, finding that cotton microfibers required probe sonication to achieve accurate detection — increasing counts by 105% on average — while rayon fibers needed no such treatment, highlighting the importance of sample preparation protocols for reliable microfiber quantification.
Quantification of textile microfibers from laundry wastewater using the Rock-Eval® device: Difference between natural and synthetic microfiber origins
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers applied the Rock-Eval pyrolysis and oxidation device to quantify synthetic and natural textile microfibers in laundry wastewater, developing specific linear regressions for polyester, polyamide, viscose, cotton, and linen to enable rapid mass quantification of microfibers on filtration membranes.
Quantification of textile microfibers from laundry wastewater using the Rock-Eval® device: Difference between natural and synthetic microfiber origins
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers applied the Rock-Eval pyrolysis and oxidation device to quantify synthetic and natural textile microfibers in laundry wastewater, developing specific linear regressions for polyester, polyamide, viscose, cotton, and linen to enable rapid mass quantification of microfibers on filtration membranes.
Quantification of textile microfibers from laundry wastewater using the Rock-Eval® device: Difference between natural and synthetic microfiber origin
AI summary Read the abstract
The Rock-Eval® pyrolysis device was used to quantify textile microfibers from laundry wastewater, successfully distinguishing natural cotton and linen fibers from synthetic polyester and nylon microfibers through specific linear regression parameters.
Influence of laundry effluent stability on fibre fragments indentification
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers examined how the stability of laundry effluent samples affects the identification and characterization of synthetic fiber fragments (FFs) released during textile washing. The study addressed methodological challenges in quantifying fibrillar microplastics across varying effluent concentrations and degradation states, finding that sample stability is a critical variable influencing accurate fiber fragment analysis.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.