0
Meta Analysis ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Sign in to save

A global meta-analysis reveals the toxicity of plastics on insect health

Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2025 5 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 73 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Muzamil Abbas, Liyan Song, Muhammad Jafir, Talha Nazir, Talha Nazir, Liyan Song, Shah Hussain, Naeem Sarwar, Naeem Sarwar, Liyan Song, Liyan Song, Liyan Song, Muhammad Jafir, Muhammad Jafir, Xia Wan

Summary

This meta-analysis pools data from global studies to reveal that microplastics and nanoplastics are harmful to insect health, affecting survival, reproduction, and development. Since insects play critical roles in pollination and food chains, their decline from plastic pollution could have cascading effects on agriculture and the broader ecosystems humans depend on.

Study Type Review

Microplastics and nanoplastics are pervasive environmental pollutants infiltrating freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems worldwide. Despite increasing recognition of their ecological impacts, the effects of these particles on insect populations remain poorly understood. Insects, which are critical for pollination, decomposition, and nutrient cycling, are increasingly exposed to microplastics and nanoplastics, potentially leading to biological harm. This study presents the first global meta-analysis that evaluates the toxicity of microplastics and nanoplastics on insect health. Our findings reveal that microplastic significantly impairs key biological traits, including survival (-1.17), growth (-0.69), development (-0.69), feeding (-0.68), fecundity (-0.47), and behavior (-0.24), with survival being the most adversely affected trait. While nanoplastics also pose risks, their effects are generally less severe than those of microplastics. Moderators such as plastic type, concentration, and exposure duration critically influence the severity of toxic effects, with higher concentrations and longer exposures leading to greater harm. These reductions in biological fitness underscore the potential for microplastics and nanoplastics to disrupt essential ecosystem functions.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper