0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Sign in to save

Cooperative agreement between countries of the North Atlantic Ocean reduces marine plastic pollution but with unequal economic benefits

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 2025 3 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Nicola Beaumont, Tobias Börger, James R. Clark, Nick Hanley, Robert J. Johnston, Keila Meginnis, Christopher Stapenhurst, Frans P. de Vries

Summary

A modeling study found that full cooperative agreement among 16 North Atlantic nations for plastic pollution control would yield aggregate annual net benefits of approximately $36 billion and a 64% reduction in plastic emissions. Game theory analysis revealed that while cooperation is economically beneficial overall, net benefits are distributed unequally across countries.

Study Type Environmental

Plastic pollution in the world's oceans threatens ecosystems and biodiversity. The connected nature of the marine environment suggests that coordinated actions by countries sharing an ocean border may provide more effective pollution control than unilateral actions by any one country. However, countries often fail to cooperate, even when joint economic benefits would be higher under cooperation. Here we present a modelling framework to determine the potential economic benefits of cooperative marine plastic pollution management. The framework integrates an estimated plastic transfer matrix from a particle tracking model with game theory to derive the economic benefits of international cooperation for 16 countries bordering the North Atlantic Ocean. Subject to modelling uncertainties, a fully cooperative agreement yields aggregate annual net benefits of around $36 billion and a 64% reduction in emissions. The net benefits of cooperation persist over alternative scenarios and considering the impact of uncertainties but vary in magnitude and distribution.

Share this paper