We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Regionalized Characterization Factors for Microplastic Emissions in Life Cycle Assessment Considering Multimedia Fate Modelling
Summary
Researchers developed location-specific impact factors for microplastic emissions to be used in life cycle assessments, accounting for how plastics move between air, water, soil, and sediment. Their model covers nine world regions and shows that the environmental impact of microplastic emissions varies significantly depending on where they are released. The study helps fill a gap in current environmental impact tools, which tend to overlook plastic pollution when comparing products.
Abstract Microplastics released into the environment represent a threat to marine, freshwater, and terrestrial ecosystems. Current Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) methods inadequately address plastic litter, leading to an underestimation of the overall impact of plastic products on ecosystem quality. This study contributes to the MarILCA working group's efforts to incorporate plastic litter impacts into LCIA by investigating microplastic emissions across various environmental compartments and on three different types of ecosystems: Marine, Freshwater and Terrestrial.Regionalized multimedia Characterization Factors (CFs) are calculated following two different approaches: 1- the surface approach, indicating the proportion of species lost over an area (in PDF·m2·yr/kg) and 2- the species approach, quantifying the proportion of species lost from the global ecosystem (in PDF·yr/kg and species·yr/kg). They are calculated for midpoint and endpoint levels and focus on physical effects on biota. A fate model based on SimpleBox4Plastic adapted to USEtox is developed to characterize the fate of 14 different polymers across 5 sizes and 9 environmental compartments on continental and global scales in 8 world regions. Fate Factors (FFs) are computed and combined with Exposure and Effect Factors (EEFs) for terrestrial, aquatic, and sedimentary species, alongside Species Distribution Factors (SDFs). The developed CFs are tested in an illustrative example that assesses the impacts of biodegradable and non-biodegradable agricultural mulch film on ecosystem quality.The endpoint CFs calculated range from 1.87E-04 and 2.95E + 04 PDF⸱m²⸱year/kgemitted for the surface approach and 1.57E-19 and 5.14E-08 PDF⸱year/kgemitted for the species approach. Low-density microplastics (MPs) exhibit similar CFs compared to high-density MPs, but for different reasons. Low-density MPs tend to accumulate in the water column, where the EEF is higher due to higher exposure via feeding, while high-density MPs accumulate in sediments, where the concentration of species is greater. Larger size microplastic emissions typically correspond to higher CFs due to longer degradation times. The species approach has a higher influence on the variation of CFs across regions. Case study results indicate that physical effects on biota exhibit a small contribution to ecosystem quality (0.34–2.40% of the overall impact) for the different mulch film scenarios.The developed CFs can be integrated into emission inventories, enhancing LCAs of plastic products and facilitating informed decisions regarding plastic use.