Environmental and Economic Impacts of Substituting Single-Use Plastic Straws: A Life-Cycle Assessment for Greece

The usage of more than 30 billion straws a year has been reported in the European Union (EU), in 2020, one year before the official ban of single-use plastics in Europe. The impacts of this plastic waste on the environment and on our health are global and can be drastic. Since then, various alternative straws have emerged. This study assesses their effectiveness, primarily from an environmental perspective, to determine the best option among those available. Life-cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted using ReCiPe 2016 methodology and ISO 14040/44 standards, alongside a preliminary cost analysis and a consumer preference survey. The findings reveal that wheat straws demonstrated the lowest overall environmental impact, with a climate change contribution of only 0.0568 kg CO2 eq. per year, while plastic straws showed the lowest cost at EUR 0.30 per year but contributed 0.084 kg CO2 eq. Metallic straws, despite being reusable, had the highest washing-related emissions, with 85% of their annual impact (~0.169 kg CO2 eq.) attributed to dishwashing. Paper and bioplastic alternatives showed up to 2.5 times higher climate impacts than plastic. Cost-wise, bamboo straws reached EUR 7.97/year, while silicone and metal straws were more economically favorable at EUR 1.17 and EUR 2.81, respectively. The consumer survey highlighted that 85% of users preferred traditional plastic straws, but 76% were open to reusable alternatives. From a socio-economic point of view, cost seems to play a minor role. However, consumers' preferences towards the new products and their awareness of health and environmental risks are very significant factors affecting their approval of new alternatives and their displeasure towards traditional straw elimination.