0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Sign in to save

Crystalline Phase Induction Strategy for the Design of Luminescent Lanthanide Coordination Polymers: Toward Plastic Waste Recycling

Journal of Environmental Bioremediation and Toxicology 2025 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Chloé Blais, Aurélien Chang, Fallou Ngom, Carole Daiguebonne, Yan Suffren, Aimin Yao, Régis Gautier, Magatte Camara, Guillaume Calvez, Kévin Bernot, Olivier Guillou

Summary

Researchers developed luminescent lanthanide coordination polymers using a 'phase induction strategy' to force certain rare-earth ions into a more rigid crystal structure, significantly improving their light-emitting efficiency. This approach, which uses phthalate derivatives recycled from plastic waste, demonstrates a promising pathway for converting plastic chemical byproducts into functional luminescent materials.

Reactions in water between a lanthanide chloride and the disodium salt of tetrachloro-phthalate (tcpa2-) lead to a family of isostructural coordination polymers with the general chemical formula [Ln2(tcpa)3(H2O)4]∞ with Ln = La-Pr (Family 2, F2). The crystal structure was solved based on the La-derivative. It crystallizes in the monoclinic system, space group P21/n (n°14) with the following cell parameters: a = 6.2491(3) Å, b = 17.5805(6) Å, c = 32.1537(14) Å, β = 90.098(2)°, V = 3532.5(3) Å3, and Z = 4. However, this series does not host coordination polymers based on lanthanides that are luminescent in the visible region. These lanthanide ions lead to compounds that crystallize in a previously reported structural family with the general chemical formula [Ln2(tcpa)3(H2O)6]∞ with Ln = Eu-Lu (Family 1, F1). Accordingly, we used a "phase induction strategy" to force Tb3+-, Eu3+-, and Sm3+ -containing molecular alloys to crystallize in F2, and we demonstrate that luminance was optimized when compared with those of F1 despite similar intermetallic energy transfers. This observation was rationalized by theoretical calculations that suggest that the greater rigidity of the crystal structure F2 could be responsible for this notable difference in the luminescence properties.

Share this paper