0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

Why are shorebirds worth preserving?

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compiled evidence for the ecosystem services provided by shorebirds, finding they function as nutrient cyclers, pest controllers, seed dispersers, bioindicators of contaminants including microplastics and heavy metals, and cultural resources, arguing that their global decline threatens services that directly benefit human communities.

Body Systems

Preserving shorebirds goes beyond their intrinsic biological value. These species have a direct relationship with humans by providing various services that benefit us directly or indirectly. In this review, we compile the contribution of shorebirds to the provision of ecosystem services to visualize how their decline affects human life. We carried out a quantitative search for information in databases for scientific articles, web pages, reports, and theses, and we discussed the most relevant studies. Shorebirds are sentinels of healthy environments. They provide nutrients for the growth of microbenthos, participate in the carbon cycle, control pests and non-native species, and help plant dispersal. In addition, they are bioindicators of contaminants such as heavy metals, microplastics, and antibiotics in natural ecosystems. They also contribute to the provision of food (meat and eggs), serving to the diet and nutrition of people in rural and indigenous communities and provide cultural services (e.g. spiritual, medicinal, birdwatching, recreation) for native and westernized communities. Although shorebirds provide various ecosystem services, there is less information available on this topic compared to others, such as population size, ecology, reproduction, or migration. Improving our knowledge on how shorebirds benefit humans will help in the implementation of effective management strategies and ensure the conservation of this group of globally threatened birds.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Differential microplastic contamination of waterbirds in a coastal region associated with trophic groups and spatial distribution

AI summary Read the abstract

A study of waterbird feces in southern Brazil found that shorebirds feeding in sediments had far higher microplastic loads than fish-eating birds, and contamination was worst near urban areas, with polyester and PVC the most common polymers detected. Trophic position and proximity to cities both shape how much plastic wildlife ingests, providing a natural monitoring system for tracking coastal microplastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Growing Menace of Microplastics in and Around the Coastal Ecosystem

AI summary Read the abstract

Coastal ecosystems face escalating microplastic threats as particles accumulate in seawater, sediments, and the tissues of fish, dolphins, crabs, plankton, and benthic organisms, degrading water quality and disrupting food webs. The growing menace to coastal biodiversity underscores the urgency of reducing plastic inputs before irreversible harm is done to fisheries and ecosystems that billions of people depend on for food and livelihoods.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic Debris Poses a Serious Threat to the Health of Our Ecosystems and Their Inhabitants

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers surveyed the global distribution and ecological threat of microplastics, finding these sub-5mm particles originating from cosmetics, textiles, and industry in even remote polar environments, with documented harms to diverse organisms across terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper