0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Decision: Suitability of river plastic monitoring methods for citizen science — R1/PR9

2025
Louise Schreyers, Tim H.M. van Emmerik, Sabrina Kirschke, Rose Pinto, Lea Schmidtke, Christian Schmidt, Christian Schmidt, Katrin Wendt-Potthoff

Summary

This editorial decision reviews the suitability of river plastic monitoring methods for citizen science deployment, weighing evidence from submitted reviews to determine which monitoring approaches are feasible, reliable, and scalable for community-led efforts to track plastic pollution in rivers.

Study Type Environmental

Rivers act as long-term plastic storage and a pathway for land-based plastic pollution into the ocean. Monitoring river plastic at a global scale remains challenging, with only limited large-scale and long-term monitoring efforts to date. Citizen science approaches may ensure a more continuous basic knowledge of plastic pollution in rivers, which can be used to assess the efficacy of reduction measures. We evaluated the suitability of several river plastic monitoring methods for citizen science, through field monitoring and a subsequent survey with citizen scientists in Accra, Ghana. Four measurement techniques (visual counting, macroplastic net sampling, microplastic net sampling and hydrometric measurements) were tested in the field and evaluated by citizen scientists. The visual counting method, used to estimate floating macroplastic transport, emerged as the most promising method for citizen science–based river plastic monitoring. Using the data collected by citizens, we quantify the variability in transport and concentration of both macroplastic and microplastic.

Share this paper