We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Techno‐Economic Analysis of Polypropylene Recycling Through Catalytic Pyrolysis: FCC Catalysts in Batch Reactors
AI summary Read the abstract
A techno-economic analysis evaluated the feasibility of recycling polypropylene waste through pyrolysis, which thermally converts plastic into fuel oil and other hydrocarbon products. The study modeled capital and operating costs against projected revenue from recovered materials to assess at what scale and feedstock price the process becomes economically viable. Results identify key cost drivers and conditions under which pyrolysis-based polypropylene recycling could compete with virgin plastic production.
ABSTRACT The short lifespan of plastics, particularly in the packaging sector, results in rapid accumulation of plastic waste, with polypropylene being a major contributor. Chemical recycling is gaining increasing attention as a strategy in managing plastic waste, facilitating the transition from a linear to a circular economy. This study presents a comprehensive techno‐economic analysis (TEA) of a polypropylene recycling process via pyrolysis designed for a facility in the Southern United States, processing 300 kt of waste annually. The process was modeled using Aspen Plus for energy and mass balance and Aspen Process Economic Analyzer for capital cost estimations, with additional manual calculations for operating costs. Economic viability was assessed through net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and Minimum Fuel Selling Price (MFSP). Results show that recycling polypropylene via catalytic pyrolysis is economically viable, with a NPV exceeding $330 million and an IRR of 29.6% over a 30‐year lifespan. The base case (300 kt/year) demonstrates the most promising financial viability, with high IRR and favorable ROI. Sensitivity analysis highlights the impact of market factors and operational costs on the economic viability of the process. Equipment cost breakdown shows that the “Storage” area, particularly the costs associated with hydrogen storage, is a significant contributor to the total capital investment. This finding highlights the importance of on‐site hydrogen production to further reduce capital investments and operational costs.
More Papers Like This
Hydrogen from Waste Plastics: Integrated Pyrolysis–Reforming Simulation and Techno-Economic Insights for a Circular Economy
AI summary Read the abstract
An integrated pyrolysis-steam reforming process for waste polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene can produce approximately 651 kg of hydrogen per hour with a 39% internal rate of return and under 6-year payback, demonstrating economic viability for plastic-to-energy conversion. This chemical recycling pathway offers a scalable route for diverting plastic waste that would otherwise fragment into environmental microplastics, addressing pollution at the source.
Analysis of Infrastructures for Processing Plastic Waste using Pyrolysis-Based Chemical Upcycling Pathways
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers modeled a national pyrolysis-based plastic upcycling infrastructure in the United States and found it could generate nearly $20 billion in economic value, achieve 34% plastic-to-plastic circularity, and yield significant environmental benefits over landfilling and incineration for post-consumer mixed plastic waste.
Municipal Plastic Waste Recycling through Pyrogasification
AI summary Read the abstract
Pyrogasification system converting 1,000 kg/h mixed municipal plastic waste into liquid fuel and gas without external heating.
Sustainable syngas production: Economic and circular economy benefits of PET waste gasification
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper evaluates the economic viability and circular economy potential of producing syngas from plastic waste as a sustainable energy pathway. The analysis considers feedstock costs, conversion efficiency, and downstream value to assess whether plastic-to-syngas routes can compete with conventional production. Results suggest that circular economy integration can improve the economics by recovering value from otherwise waste plastic streams.
Process simulation and energy optimization of an integrated plastic waste pyrolysis power plant: A techno-economic study
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used Aspen Plus to simulate and economically evaluate a 10-ton/hour plastic waste pyrolysis plant, finding that a combined-cycle configuration generating 7 MW of net electricity recovers its $22 million capital cost within two years, while a dual gas-and-oil scenario can scale output to 39.4 MW at modest additional payback time.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.