We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Environmental Footprint of COVID-19
AI summary Read the abstract
This scoping review of 86 studies found that the COVID-19 pandemic produced mixed environmental outcomes: lockdowns temporarily improved air quality and reduced noise pollution, but the surge in medical and single-use plastic waste overwhelmed waste management systems, with most ecological gains proving unsustainable without structural policy reform.
Objectives: This scoping review aims to systematically assess the environmental footprint of the COVID-19 pandemic across multiple ecological domains. It investigates the pandemic's short- and long-term impacts on air quality, waste generation, energy consumption, water systems, biodiversity, marine environments, and noise pollution, while identifying policy challenges and opportunities for sustainable recovery. Methods: Following the PRISMA-ScR framework, a systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Studies published from December 2019 to April 2025 were screened for empirical evidence on COVID-19’s environmental effects. Out of 495 initial records, 86 peer-reviewed studies met the inclusion criteria and were synthesized thematically across seven environmental domains. Results: Findings indicate that air pollution levels, particularly NO₂ and CO₂, significantly declined during global lockdowns, improving urban air quality. Marine and freshwater ecosystems experienced short-term rejuvenation, while underwater and urban noise pollution dropped markedly. However, the surge in medical and single-use plastic waste overwhelmed waste management systems. Energy consumption dropped across all fossil fuels, while renewable energy gained traction. Water demand rose due to increased hygiene practices, exposing WASH inequalities. Biodiversity temporarily recovered but suffered from funding cuts, poaching, and conservation setbacks. Conclusion: The environmental impacts of COVID-19 were both beneficial and detrimental. While temporary ecological recovery was observed, most gains were unsustainable without policy reform. The pandemic underscores the urgent need for structural changes in environmental governance, waste systems, energy transition, and biodiversity conservation to ensure long-term planetary health and resilience.
More Papers Like This
Impacts of COVID-19 Lockdowns on Environmental Degradation and Climate Change: A Review
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examined how COVID-19 lockdowns created a global natural experiment revealing both the scale of improvement achievable through reduced human activity and new environmental pressures from pandemic waste. While lockdowns briefly improved air quality and water clarity, surges in PPE and medical plastic waste intensified microplastic pollution risks, and CO₂ emissions rebounded strongly by 2021, demonstrating that durable environmental gains require systemic policy change.
Positive and negative impacts of COVID-19 on the environment: A critical review with sustainability approaches
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines both the positive and negative environmental impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. While lockdowns temporarily reduced air, water, and noise pollution, the massive increase in disposable masks, gloves, and plastic packaging created a surge in microplastic contamination. The study highlights how the pandemic exposed the tension between public health measures and environmental sustainability.
Implications of COVID-19 pandemic on environmental compartments: Is plastic pollution a major issue?
AI summary Read the abstract
This study assessed the effects of polystyrene microplastics on liver function and lipid metabolism in exposed mice, finding hepatic lipid accumulation, elevated liver enzymes, and altered expression of genes involved in fatty acid metabolism. The results suggest that chronic microplastic ingestion may contribute to metabolic liver disease through disruption of lipid homeostasis.
COVID-19, a double-edged sword for the environment: a review on the impacts of COVID-19 on the environment
AI summary Read the abstract
This review assessed pandemic-related environmental impacts, finding that COVID-19 reduced air and water pollution temporarily through industrial slowdowns but simultaneously increased plastic waste, antibiotic release, and chemical contamination from disinfectants, producing a mixed and complex environmental legacy.
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the environment, waste management, and energy sectors: a deeper look into the long-term impacts
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines the environmental consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, finding that while short-term air quality improvements occurred during lockdowns, the long-term negative effects are far more significant. Researchers documented massive increases in single-use plastic waste from masks, gloves, and packaging, contributing substantially to microplastic pollution. The study highlights that the pandemic reversed progress on waste reduction and created new challenges for environmental management across waste, energy, and pollution sectors.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.