We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
The Trojan Horse of Hybrid Governance: Corporate Power and Global Plastics Governance
AI summary Read the abstract
This article argues that the emergence of hybrid institutional governance in global plastics policy—centered on voluntary, industry-led multistakeholder initiatives orchestrated through UNEP—risks entrenching corporate-friendly arrangements that undermine meaningful regulation. The authors contend this hybrid governance model legitimizes weak rules and sustains corporate dominance rather than driving systemic transformation toward sustainable plastics management.
ABSTRACT This article examines the emergence of a hybrid institutional complex (HIC) in global plastics governance. By interrogating the structure, features, and contradictions of hybrid global plastics governance, we foreground the de facto orchestrator role of the UN Environmental Programme (UNEP) that promotes multistakeholder partnerships to redress plastic pollution and to realise SDG 12 on Responsible Consumption and Production. However, we contend that embedding voluntary, industry‐led multistakeholder initiatives within and through the contested UN Global Plastics Treaty process risks entrenching corporate‐friendly governance arrangements at the expense of more stringent governance and systemic transformation. We show how this governance model legitimises weak regulations, promotes voluntary governance that reinforces market norms, and sustains corporate dominance. We thus highlight tensions between procedural mechanisms and substantive sustainability objectives within global plastics governance. Ultimately, we contend that emerging hybrid plastic governance may reinforce, rather than transform, the unsustainable status quo.
More Papers Like This
A little less conversation: How existing governance can strengthen the future global plastics treaty
AI summary Read the abstract
This analysis examines existing multi-level governance structures for plastics—from global agreements to local regulations—and explores how a new global plastics treaty could complement rather than duplicate these existing frameworks. The authors identify principal roles, shortcomings, and gaps in current governance and propose ways to integrate a new binding instrument with the Basel, Rotterdam, and Stockholm Conventions and other relevant regulatory bodies.
Who is governing the global plastics crisis? Mapping the global plastics governance landscape
AI summary Read the abstract
Despite growing alarm over plastic pollution, including tiny microplastics now found in our food, water, and even our bodies, no single global authority is actually in charge of solving the problem. This study found that the current patchwork of UN agencies, environmental treaties, and industry partnerships mostly shares information and sets voluntary guidelines rather than enforcing real change, and that businesses often use these partnerships to look eco-friendly while continuing normal plastic production. For consumers, this means the burden of reducing plastic exposure and pollution largely falls on individual choices and local regulations, since meaningful global rules aren't yet in place
The battle for plastic hegemony: the petrochemical historical bloc and the UN Global Plastics Treaty
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers introduce the concept of a 'petrochemical historical bloc' to explain how state, corporate, and financial actors collectively defend continued plastic production, showing through analysis of UN Global Plastics Treaty negotiations how industry partnerships promote waste-management circularity while blocking upstream production limits.
Combining CSR and Political Activities of MNCs Through Meta-Organizations: The Case of Plastic Pollution in Emerging Countries
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed five case studies from West Africa and Southeast Asia showing how multinational corporations use collective meta-organizations to simultaneously pursue CSR goals and shape Extended Producer Responsibility regulation, finding that the success of these hybrid corporate-political strategies depends heavily on national governance quality and the involvement of international organizations.
When Meta-organizations Enhance Their Capacity for Action: The Role of Hybrid Regulation and Multinational Corporations in Plastic Waste Management
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers studied big companies in Ghana, Ivory Coast, Thailand, and Vietnam that joined forces in groups to help manage plastic waste. The study found these company groups used rules combining government and industry regulation to gain official recognition, which helped them grow membership, gain more resources, and operate with more independence.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.