0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Comparative Analysis of Plastic Waste Management Options Sustainability Profiles

Polymers 2025 4 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Mădălin Enache, Daniela Gavrilescu, Carmen Teodosiu

Summary

Using the US EPA WARM model, researchers compared greenhouse gas emissions from three plastic waste management options (recycling, energy recovery, and landfilling) in the EU, USA, and Romania. Recycling consistently produced the lowest GHG emissions across all regions, reinforcing circular economy frameworks as the preferred end-of-life strategy for plastics.

Polymers

Efficient plastic waste end-of-life management is a serious worldwide environmental issue motivated by growing waste production and negative effects of wrongful disposal. This study presents a comparative overview of plastic waste management regimes within the European Union (EU), the United States of America (USA), and Romania, ranked with circular economy goals. By using the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Waste Reduction Model (WARM), version 16, the study provides a quantified score to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions within three large options of management: recycling, energy recovery through combustion, and landfilling. The model setup utilizes region-specific information on legislation, base technology, and recycling efficiency. The outcomes show that recycling always entails net GHG emissions reductions, i.e., -4.49 kg CO2e/capita/year for EU plastic waste and -20 kg CO2e/capita/year for USA plastic waste. Combustion and landfilling have positive net emissions from 1.76 to 14.24 kg CO2e/capita/year. Economic indicators derived from the model also show significant variation: salaries for PET management amounted to USD 2.87 billion in the EU and USD 377 million in the USA, and tax collection was USD 506 million and USD 2.01 billion, respectively. The conclusions highlight the wider environmental and socioeconomic benefits of recycling and reinforce its status as a cornerstone of circular-economy sustainable plastic waste management and a strategic element of national development agendas, with special reference to Romania's national agenda.

Share this paper