0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Remediation Sign in to save

Variation in microplastic concentration, characteristics and distribution in sewage sludge & biosolids around the world

Figshare 2025 Score: 38 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
D Harley-Nyang (21142985), FA Memon (21853103), A Osorio Baquero (21142991), T Galloway (13690630)

Summary

This review synthesizes global data on microplastic concentrations, characteristics, and distribution in sewage sludge and biosolids, drawing on studies showing wastewater treatment works remove 57-99% of incoming microplastics, concentrating them in sludge byproducts. The review highlights the significance of this concentration pathway and what happens to these microplastics when sludge is applied to land or otherwise managed.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastics have been reported in wastewater treatment works across the world. The majority of microplastics are removed during the wastewater treatment process, with removal efficiencies between 57 % to 99 %. What happens to the microplastics removed from the wastewater, and how they accumulate in sewage sludge and biosolids (by-products of the wastewater treatment process), remains a topic of high interest. Here we systematically reviewed the current state of knowledge on the presence, concentration, and characteristics of microplastics in sewage sludge and biosolids globally to understand how biosolids may act as a pathway for microplastic pollution to soils. A systematic search was performed on the Web of Science and Science Direct databases. Sixty-five studies reporting on microplastic pollution in sewage sludge and biosolid products were identified, spanning twenty-five countries. Reported microplastic concentrations varied considerably from 0.193 microplastics/g to 1.69 × 105 microplastics/g with a median microplastic concentration of 22.41 microplastics/g, illustrating how many microplastics are captured during the wastewater treatment process, and retained in the sewage sludge. The extent to which biosolid recycling pollutes the terrestrial environment was compared between countries. High numbers of microplastics were estimated to reach fields via biosolid application with a wide variation of 8.2 × 1010 to 1.29 × 1015 microplastics/year between sixteen countries, although there was no significant difference in microplastic concentration between fields with a history of biosolid applications and control fields. The comparative risk this delivery of approx. 0.4 to 6430 tonnes of microplastics poses compared to the environmental benefits of nutrient and carbon recycling associated with biosolids reuse, or compared to other sources of microplastic pollution remains a global research imperative. The next step in scientific research needs to focus on solutions to the biosolid and circular economy conundrum - biosolids are a valuable source of nutrients but contain high concentrations of microplastics, which are ultimately entering the terrestrial environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Variation in microplastic concentration, characteristics and distribution in sewage sludge & biosolids around the world

Researchers systematically reviewed 65 studies on microplastics in sewage sludge and biosolids from wastewater treatment plants around the world. They found that while treatment processes remove 57% to 99% of microplastics from wastewater, the removed particles concentrate in sludge that is often applied to agricultural land. The review highlights that land application of biosolids may be a significant, underappreciated pathway for microplastic pollution in soils.

Article Tier 2

A review of the removal of microplastics in global wastewater treatment plants: Characteristics and mechanisms

This review analyzed data from 38 wastewater treatment plants across 11 countries to understand how effectively they remove microplastics. While treatment plants can remove the majority of microplastics from wastewater, significant quantities still pass through into waterways, and the microplastics captured in sewage sludge may re-enter the environment when that sludge is applied to farmland.

Article Tier 2

Review on the occurrence and fate of microplastics in Sewage Treatment Plants

This review compiled occurrence and fate data for microplastics across influent, effluent, and sludge from sewage treatment plants, finding that concentrations range up to 3,160 particles/L in raw wastewater and that treatment achieves up to 98% removal, with the retained microplastics concentrated in sludge. The authors highlight that while WWTPs protect receiving waters, sludge disposal transfers the plastic burden to soils.

Article Tier 2

Sources, fate, effects, and analysis of microplastic in wastewater treatment plants: A review

This review examines how wastewater treatment plants handle microplastics, finding that while they can remove over 90% of particles, the sheer volume of water processed means billions of microplastics still escape into waterways daily. The remaining microplastics also concentrate in sewage sludge, which is often spread on agricultural land. Wastewater treatment plants are both a filter for and a redistribution point of microplastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic removal and management strategies for wastewater treatment plants

This review examines how well different wastewater treatment technologies remove microplastics and what management strategies can improve performance. While conventional treatment plants can remove a large percentage of microplastics from water, the particles often end up concentrated in sewage sludge that gets applied to farmland. The study highlights the need for advanced treatment options and better management of biosolids to prevent microplastics from simply being transferred from water to soil.

Share this paper